Karavasilis Efstratios, Parthimos Theodore P, Papatriantafyllou John D, Christidi Foteini, Papageorgiou Sokratis G, Kapsas George, Papanicolaou Andrew C, Seimenis Ioannis
Second Department of Radiology, University General Hospital 'Attikon', Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 19 Papadiamantopoulou Street, Athens, Greece.
Department of Medical Physics, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2019 Jun;42(2):563-571. doi: 10.1007/s13246-019-00758-1. Epub 2019 May 3.
The inconsistency of volumetric results often seen in MR neuroimaging studies can be partially attributed to small sample sizes and variable data analysis approaches. Increased sample size through multi-scanner studies can tackle the former, but combining data across different scanner platforms and field-strengths may introduce a variability factor capable of masking subtle statistical differences. To investigate the sample size effect on regression analysis between depressive symptoms and grey matter volume (GMV) loss in Alzheimer's disease (AD), a retrospective multi-scanner investigation was conducted. A cohort of 172 AD patients, with or without comorbid depressive symptoms, was studied. Patients were scanned with different imaging protocols in four different MRI scanners operating at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Acquired data were uniformly analyzed using the computational anatomy toolbox (CAT12) of the statistical parametric mapping (SPM12) software. Single- and multi-scanner regression analyses were applied to identify the anatomical pattern of correlation between GM loss and depression severity. A common anatomical pattern of correlation between GMV loss and increased depression severity, mostly involving sensorimotor areas, was identified in all patient subgroups imaged in different scanners. Analysis of the pooled multi-scanner data confirmed the above finding employing a more conservative statistical criterion. In the retrospective multi-scanner setting, a significant correlation was also exhibited for temporal and frontal areas. Increasing the sample size by retrospectively pooling multi-scanner data, irrespective of the acquisition platform and parameters employed, can facilitate the identification of anatomical areas with a strong correlation between GMV changes and depression symptoms in AD patients.
磁共振神经成像研究中经常出现的体积测量结果不一致,部分原因可归结为样本量小和数据分析方法的差异。通过多扫描仪研究增加样本量可以解决前者的问题,但跨不同扫描仪平台和场强合并数据可能会引入一个变异性因素,从而掩盖细微的统计差异。为了研究样本量对阿尔茨海默病(AD)抑郁症状与灰质体积(GMV)损失之间回归分析的影响,进行了一项回顾性多扫描仪研究。研究了一组172例AD患者,这些患者伴有或不伴有共病抑郁症状。患者在四台分别运行于1.5T或3.0T的不同MRI扫描仪上采用不同的成像方案进行扫描。使用统计参数映射(SPM12)软件的计算解剖工具箱(CAT12)对获取的数据进行统一分析。应用单扫描仪和多扫描仪回归分析来确定GM损失与抑郁严重程度之间的解剖学相关模式。在不同扫描仪成像的所有患者亚组中,均发现GMV损失与抑郁严重程度增加之间存在共同的解剖学相关模式,主要涉及感觉运动区域。对汇总的多扫描仪数据进行分析,采用更保守的统计标准证实了上述发现。在回顾性多扫描仪设置中,颞叶和额叶区域也表现出显著相关性。通过回顾性汇总多扫描仪数据来增加样本量,无论采用何种采集平台和参数,都有助于识别AD患者中GMV变化与抑郁症状之间具有强相关性的解剖区域。