Fonseca Gabriel M, Ortíz-Contreras Jorge, Ramírez-Lagos Carlos, López-Lázaro Sandra
Centro de Investigación en Odontología Legal y Forense -CIO-, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
Centro de Investigación en Odontología Legal y Forense -CIO-, Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile.
J Forensic Leg Med. 2019 Jul;65:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
Lip print identification has been proposed as an additional tool for crime investigation because of the supposed uniqueness of labial grooves; however, critics of the validity and reliability for methods and techniques redefined standards and requirements in order to consider this discipline a real forensic identification science. During our research we identified recent literature, presented here, which although extensive, have focused almost entirely on anthropological topics with outdated references which were not from primary sources and, furthermore, were erroneously quoted. Currently, authors continue to use the concept of lip pattern uniqueness, yet the greatest part of their research has failed to support this hypothesis under current scientific standards. Concepts and designs needed to evaluate materials for lip print development - the isolation of DNA, evaluation of inter-rater reliability in identifying their patterns or known potential rate of error - are scarcely mentioned in the reviewed literature. Lip print identification has been important historically, but the new paradigm makes the redefinition of the current research necessary to stop guesswork and speculation.
由于唇纹沟的独特性,唇纹识别已被提议作为犯罪调查的一种辅助工具;然而,对方法和技术的有效性及可靠性持批评态度的人重新定义了标准和要求,以便将这一学科视为一门真正的法医鉴定科学。在我们的研究过程中,我们找到了近期的文献,尽管数量众多,但几乎完全集中在人类学主题上,参考文献过时,并非来自原始资料,而且还被错误引用。目前,作者们继续使用唇纹独特性的概念,但按照当前的科学标准,他们的大部分研究未能支持这一假设。在综述文献中,几乎没有提及评估唇纹显影材料所需的概念和设计——DNA的分离、识别唇纹模式时评分者间信度的评估或已知的潜在错误率。唇纹识别在历史上一直很重要,但新的范式使得重新定义当前的研究成为必要,以停止猜测和推测。