Suppr超能文献

[局部晚期高危直肠癌患者新辅助综合治疗的疗效与安全性分析]

[Analysis on efficacy and safety of total neoadjuvant therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer with high risk factors].

作者信息

Ouyang G L, Meng W J, Shu P, Deng X B, Wu B, Jiang D, Zhuang H, Shen Y L, Zhou Z G, Wang Z Q, Wang X

机构信息

Department of Abdominal Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 25;22(4):349-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.04.007.

Abstract

To evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with high risk factors. Data of 101 patients who were diagnosed with stage II-III rectal cancer with high risk factors and received TNT between March 2015 and January 2018 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were analyzed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria: (1) patients were diagnosed with stage II-III rectal cancer by high-resolution MRI combined with CT and endorectal ultrasound; (2) at least one high risk factor: cT4a, cT4b, cN2, EMVI+, CRM+ and lateral lymph node+; (3) distance from tumor to anal verge was within 15 cm; (4) Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score was 0-1; bone marrow function, liver function and kidney function were suitable for chemoradiotherapy; (5) patients were treated with TNT strategy; (6) the follow-up data and postoperative pathological data were complete. Patients with previous rectal cancer surgery (except prophylactic colostomy), pelvic radiotherapy, and systemic chemotherapy, those with distant metastases, those without neoadjuvant radiotherapy, those receiving less than 4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. The regimen of TNT: 3 cycles of induction CAPOX (oxaliplatin plus capecitabine) were followed by pelvic radiotherapy and concurrent CAPOX, then 3 cycles of consolidation CAPOX were delivered after radiotherapy. Total mesorectal resection (TME) or watch-and-wait strategy was selected according to the therapeutic effect and patients' wishes. Short-term efficacy, including tumor regression grade (TRG), pathological complete response (pCR), clinical complete response (cCR), postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery, and adverse events (AE) to radiotherapy and chemotherapy (measured using CTCAE 4.0) was analyzed. The 101 patients included 68 males (67.3%) and 33 females (32.7%) with a median age of 54 years. The proportion of patients with cT4a, cT4b, cN2 and enlarged lateral lymph node was 13.9%, 29.7%, 56.4% and 43.6%, respectively. The mean cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 6.0±1.3. Seventy-five patients (74.3%) received at least 6 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 100 (99.0%) completed radiotherapy. The mean cycle of induction and consolidation chemotherapy was 2.0±0.9 and 2.8±1.0 respectively. Most common grade 3 AE was leucopenia (=13, 12.9%) and thrombocytopenia (=7, 6.9%). Grade 3 diarrhea and radiation dermatitis were observed in 5 cases (5.0%) respectively. Grade 3 anemia and rectal pain were observed in 4 cases (4.0%) respectively. And rectal mucositis was observed in 2 cases (2.0%). Most of the AE was observed during concurrent chemoradiotherapy. No grade 4 or higher AE was observed. After TNT, 32 patients (31.7%) achieved pCR or cCR, and 62 patients (60.4%) achieved partial response (PR). Only 2 patients (2.0%) developed distant metastasis after chemoradiotherapy, while the other patients did not show disease progression. Seven patients (6.9%) with cCR refused surgery and selected watch-and-wait, while 7 patients without cCR still refused surgery. The other 87 patients (86.1%) underwent TME successfully. The mean interval from the completion of chemoradiotherapy to surgery was (20.1±8.5) weeks. The R0 resection rate was 97.7% (85/87).The morbidity of surgical complication was 16.1% (14/87), including pelvic infection or abscess in 6 cases (6.9%), anastomotic leakage in 3 (3.4%), hemorrhage in 2 (2.3%), and gastrointestinal dysfunction in 3 (3.4%). Pathological findings revealed that 24 cases (27.6%) had TRG 0, 20 (23.0%) had TRG 1, 30 (34.5%) TRG 2, and 13 (14.9%) TRG 3. TNT is safe and has good short-term efficacy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients with high risk factors.

摘要

评估全新辅助治疗(TNT)在具有高危因素的局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者中的安全性和初步疗效。回顾性分析了2015年3月至2018年1月期间在四川大学华西医院被诊断为具有高危因素的II-III期直肠癌并接受TNT治疗的101例患者的数据。纳入标准:(1)通过高分辨率MRI联合CT和直肠内超声诊断为II-III期直肠癌;(2)至少一项高危因素:cT4a、cT4b、cN2、EMVI+、CRM+和侧方淋巴结+;(3)肿瘤距肛缘距离在15cm以内;(4)东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态评分为0-1;骨髓功能、肝功能和肾功能适合放化疗;(5)患者采用TNT策略治疗;(6)随访数据和术后病理数据完整。排除既往有直肠癌手术史(预防性结肠造口除外)、盆腔放疗和全身化疗史、有远处转移、未接受新辅助放疗、接受新辅助化疗少于4个周期的患者。TNT方案:诱导期3周期CAPOX(奥沙利铂加卡培他滨),随后盆腔放疗并同步CAPOX,放疗后给予3周期巩固期CAPOX。根据治疗效果和患者意愿选择全直肠系膜切除术(TME)或观察等待策略。分析短期疗效,包括肿瘤退缩分级(TRG)、病理完全缓解(pCR)、临床完全缓解(cCR)、术后30天内的术后并发症以及放化疗的不良事件(AE,使用CTCAE 4.0进行测量)。101例患者中,男性68例(67.3%),女性33例(32.7%),中位年龄54岁。cT4a、cT4b.cN2和侧方淋巴结肿大患者的比例分别为13.9%、29.7%、56.4%和43.6%。新辅助化疗的平均周期为6.0±1.3。75例(74.3%)患者接受了至少6周期新辅助化疗,100例(99.0%)完成了放疗。诱导期和巩固期化疗的平均周期分别为2.0±0.9和2.8±1.0。最常见的3级AE是白细胞减少(=13,12.9%)和血小板减少(=7,6.9%)。3级腹泻和放射性皮炎分别在5例(5.0%)患者中观察到。3级贫血和直肠疼痛分别在4例(4.0%)患者中观察到。2例(2.0%)患者出现直肠黏膜炎。大多数AE在同步放化疗期间观察到。未观察到4级或更高等级的AE。TNT治疗后,32例(31.7%)患者达到pCR或cCR,62例(60.4%)患者达到部分缓解(PR)。仅2例(2.0%)患者在放化疗后发生远处转移,其他患者未出现疾病进展。7例(6.9%)cCR患者拒绝手术并选择观察等待,7例非cCR患者仍拒绝手术。其他87例(86.1%)患者成功接受了TME。从放化疗结束到手术的平均间隔时间为(20.1±8.5)周。R0切除率为97.7%(85/87)。手术并发症发生率为16.1%(14/87),包括盆腔感染或脓肿6例(6.9%)、吻合口漏3例(3.4%)、出血2例(2.3%)和胃肠功能障碍)3例(3.4%)。病理结果显示,24例(27.6%)患者TRG为0,20例(23.0%)患者TRG为1,30例(34.5%)患者TRG为2,13例(14.9%)患者TRG为。TNT对具有高危因素的局部晚期直肠癌患者是安全的,且具有良好的短期疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验