Jimenez-Garcia Victoria Alejandra, Yamada Masayoshi, Ikematsu Hiroaki, Takamaru Hiroyuki, Abe Seiichiro, Sakamoto Taku, Nakajima Takeshi, Matsuda Takahisa, Saito Yutaka
National Cancer Center Hospital, Endoscopy Division, Tokyo, Japan.
National Cancer Center Hospital East, Division of Endoscopy and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Kashiwa, Japan.
Endosc Int Open. 2019 May;7(5):E664-E671. doi: 10.1055/a-0848-8048. Epub 2019 May 3.
Surgery is the standard treatment for colon tumors associated with diverticulum. se of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) to treat such tumors is controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and feasibility of ESD in treating superficial colorectal tumors situated near or involving diverticulum. Consecutive patients from two referral centers who had colorectal tumors near or involving diverticulum treated by ESD were retrospectively studied. Clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Of the 12 patients studied, six had tumors near diverticulum and six had tumors involving diverticulum. The overall en-bloc R0 resection rate, median tumor size and procedure time were 67 %, 26.5 mm (range, 15 - 80 mm) and 110 minutes (range, 50 - 220 minutes), respectively. For tumors near diverticulum group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was 100 % and no adverse events (AEs) or residual/recurrent tumors were observed. In contrast, for intradiverticular tumors group, the en-bloc R0 resection rate was low at 33 %, and one AE (perforation) was observed. The diverticula were ≥ 6 mm in diameter in the patients with incomplete resection. However, all but one diverticulum was unrecognized before ESD. Two residual tumors were detected at the 12-month surveillance and one required surgery. This case series indicates that ESD is safe and feasible for treating colorectal tumors near a diverticulum and might be feasible for tumors involving a diverticulum smaller than 6 mm. Selection for smaller diverticulum size may contribute to higher en-bloc R0 resection rates.
手术是治疗与憩室相关的结肠肿瘤的标准方法。使用内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)治疗此类肿瘤存在争议。本研究的目的是评估ESD治疗位于憩室附近或累及憩室的浅表性结直肠肿瘤的安全性和可行性。对来自两个转诊中心接受ESD治疗的位于憩室附近或累及憩室的结直肠肿瘤患者进行回顾性研究。分析临床病理特征和临床结局。在研究的12例患者中,6例肿瘤位于憩室附近,6例肿瘤累及憩室。整块R0切除率、肿瘤中位大小和手术时间分别为67%、26.5mm(范围15 - 80mm)和110分钟(范围50 - 220分钟)。对于憩室附近肿瘤组,整块R0切除率为100%,未观察到不良事件(AE)或残留/复发性肿瘤。相比之下,对于憩室内肿瘤组,整块R0切除率较低,为33%,观察到1例AE(穿孔)。在切除不完全的患者中,憩室直径≥6mm。然而,除1个憩室外,所有憩室在ESD前均未被识别。在12个月的随访中检测到2例残留肿瘤,其中1例需要手术。该病例系列表明,ESD治疗憩室附近的结直肠肿瘤是安全可行的,对于累及直径小于6mm憩室的肿瘤可能也是可行的。选择较小的憩室大小可能有助于提高整块R0切除率。