Adams E Kathleen, Johnston Emily M, Guy Gery, Joski Peter, Ketsche Patricia
Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Urban Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Glob Pediatr Health. 2019 Apr 26;6:2333794X19840361. doi: 10.1177/2333794X19840361. eCollection 2019.
We examine the impact of Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) eligibility expansions 1999 to 2012 on child and joint parent/child insurance coverage. We use changes in state CHIP income eligibility levels and data from the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement to create child/parent dyads. We use logistic regression to estimate marginal effects of eligibility expansions on coverage in families with incomes below 300% federal poverty level (FPL) and, in turn, 150% to 300% FPL. The latter is the income range most expansions targeted. We find CHIP expansions increased public coverage among children in families 150% to 300% FPL by 2.5 percentage points (pp). We find increased joint parent/child coverage of 2.3 pp ( = .055) but only in states where the public eligibility levels for parent and child are within 50 pp. In these states, the CHIP expansion increased the probability that both parent/child are publicly insured (2.5 pp) among insured dyads, but where the eligibility levels are further apart (51-150 pp; >150 pp), CHIP expansions increase the probability of mixed coverage-one public, one private-by 0.9 to 1.5 pp. Overall, families made decisions regarding coverage that put the child first but parents took advantage of joint parent/child coverage when eligibility levels were close. Joint public parent/child coverage can have positive care-seeking effects as well as reduced financial burdens for low-income families.
我们研究了1999年至2012年儿童健康保险计划(CHIP)资格扩展对儿童以及父母/子女联合保险覆盖情况的影响。我们利用各州CHIP收入资格水平的变化以及当前人口调查年度社会和经济补充调查的数据来创建儿童/父母二元组。我们使用逻辑回归来估计资格扩展对收入低于300%联邦贫困线(FPL)家庭的保险覆盖情况的边际效应,进而估计对收入在150%至300% FPL家庭的边际效应。后者是大多数资格扩展所针对的收入范围。我们发现,CHIP扩展使收入在150%至300% FPL家庭中的儿童公共保险覆盖率提高了2.5个百分点(pp)。我们发现父母/子女联合保险覆盖率提高了2.3个百分点(p = 0.055),但仅在父母和子女的公共资格水平相差50个百分点以内的州。在这些州,CHIP扩展增加了父母/子女双方都拥有公共保险的可能性(2.5个百分点),但在资格水平相差更远的州(51 - 150个百分点;>150个百分点),CHIP扩展使混合保险(一方公共保险,一方私人保险)的可能性提高了0.9至1.5个百分点。总体而言,家庭在做出保险覆盖决策时将孩子放在首位,但当资格水平接近时,父母会利用父母/子女联合保险。父母/子女联合公共保险不仅可以产生积极的就医效果,还能减轻低收入家庭的经济负担。