FWO PhD Fellow, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Associate Professor, Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Department of Communication Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.
Disasters. 2019 Jul;43(3):478-508. doi: 10.1111/disa.12353. Epub 2019 May 9.
The world has seen a major increase in forced displacement since 2011. As a growing number of states implement restrictive refugee policies, public communication has become essential for refugee organisations. This study analysed, therefore, three international refugee organisations' discursive strategies towards the recent Syrian crisis, as well as their production and the social context. A critical discourse analysis of international press releases (N=122) and six semi-structured interviews with press and regional officers revealed that the observed actors largely dehumanise displaced people and subordinate them to the 'Western self' and state interests; displaced people hardly ever acquire their own voice. The study found that the medium characteristics of press releases and the importance of media attention result in a depersonalising humanitarian discourse. In addition, there were indications of a post-humanitarian discourse that reproduced the humanitarian sector's 'marketisation'. Finally, the examined organisations use the political realist cross-issue persuasion strategy, displaying displaced people as resettlement objects.
自 2011 年以来,世界范围内被迫流离失所的人数大幅增加。随着越来越多的国家实施限制难民政策,公众沟通对于难民组织来说变得至关重要。因此,本研究分析了三个国际难民组织针对近期叙利亚危机的话语策略,以及这些组织的宣传内容和社会背景。通过对国际新闻稿(N=122)进行批判性话语分析,并对 6 名新闻和地区官员进行半结构化访谈,研究发现,所观察到的行为体在很大程度上使流离失所者失去人性,并将他们置于“西方自我”和国家利益之下;流离失所者几乎没有自己的声音。研究还发现,新闻稿的媒介特征和媒体关注度的重要性导致了去人性化的人道主义话语。此外,还存在着后人道主义话语的迹象,这种话语再现了人道主义部门的“市场化”。最后,被研究的组织使用跨问题的政治现实主义说服策略,将流离失所者视为重新安置的对象。