Department of Psychology, City, University of London, London, UK.
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK.
Cortex. 2019 Oct;119:12-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
Current approaches to the diagnosis of developmental prosopagnosia emphasise the perception and identification of same-ethnicity faces. This convention ensures that perceptual impairment arising from developmental prosopagnosia can be distinguished from problems arising from a lack of visual experience with particular facial ethnicities - the so-called 'Other-Ethnicity Effect'. The present study sought to determine whether the perceptual difficulties seen in developmental prosopagnosia - diagnosed using same-ethnicity faces - extend to other-ethnicity faces. First, we sought to determine whether a group of Caucasian developmental prosopagnosics (N = 15) and typical Caucasian controls (N = 30) had similar experience with same- and other-ethnicity faces during development. All participants therefore completed a contact questionnaire that enquired about their experience of Caucasian, Black, and East Asian faces, at different developmental stages. Importantly, the two groups described very similar levels of visual experience with other-ethnicity faces. Second, we administered a sequential matching task to measure participants' ability to discriminate same- (Caucasian) and other-ethnicity (Black, East Asian) faces. Relative to the experience-matched controls, the prosopagnosics were less accurate at discriminating both same- and other-ethnicity faces, and we found no evidence of disproportionate impairment for same-ethnicity faces. Given that the prosopagnosics and controls had similar opportunity to develop visual expertise for other-ethnicity faces, these results indicate that developmental prosopagnosia impairs recognition of both same- and other-ethnicity faces. The fact that developmental prosopagnosia affects the perception of both same- and other-ethnicity faces suggests that different facial ethnicities engage similar visual processing mechanisms. Our findings support the view that susceptibility to developmental prosopagnosia, and a lack of contact with other-ethnicity faces, contribute independently to the poor recognition of other-ethnicity faces.
目前,发展性面孔失认症的诊断方法强调对同种族面孔的感知和识别。这种方法可以确保由于发展性面孔失认症引起的感知障碍与由于缺乏特定种族面部的视觉经验而引起的问题(即所谓的“异族效应”)区分开来。本研究旨在确定在使用同种族面孔诊断的发展性面孔失认症中观察到的感知困难是否会扩展到异族面孔。首先,我们试图确定一组白种人发展性面孔失认症患者(N=15)和典型的白种人对照组(N=30)在发育过程中对同种族和异族种族面孔的经验是否相似。因此,所有参与者都完成了一份接触问卷,询问了他们在不同发育阶段对白种人、黑人和东亚人的面部经验。重要的是,两组人对异族种族面孔的视觉经验描述非常相似。其次,我们进行了顺序匹配任务,以衡量参与者辨别同种族(白种人)和异族种族(黑种人、东亚人)面孔的能力。与经验匹配的对照组相比,面孔失认症患者在辨别同种族和异族种族面孔时的准确性较低,我们没有发现同种族面孔不成比例的损伤证据。鉴于面孔失认症患者和对照组有相似的机会发展对异族种族面孔的视觉专业知识,这些结果表明,发展性面孔失认症会损害对同种族和异族种族面孔的识别。发展性面孔失认症会影响对同种族和异族种族面孔的感知,这表明不同种族的面孔会使用相似的视觉处理机制。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即发展性面孔失认症的易感性和与异族种族面孔的接触不足会独立导致对异族种族面孔的识别能力下降。