Detection of left atrial appendage thrombi by third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT: Iodine concentration versus conventional enhancement measurements.

BACKGROUND

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) can differentiate iodine from other materials through the material decomposition technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of DECT-derived iodine concentration (mg/ml) with conventional enhancement measurements (HU), in detecting left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi and differentiating thrombi from circulatory stasis in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients referred for catheter ablation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients were prospectively recruited and scanned using a third-generation dual-source CT system in dual-energy mode. Regions of interest were placed inside the filling defect in the LAA and ascending aorta (AA) of the same sections, to determine iodine concentration and the LAA/AA HU ratio. The diagnostic performance of iodine concentration and LAA/AA HU ratios were compared using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard.

RESULTS

Among 302 patients, 10 thrombi and 27 cases with spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) were detected by TEE. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of iodine concentration were superior to those of LAA/AA HU ratios (iodine concentration: 99.7%, 100%, 99.7%, 90.9%, and 100% vs. LAA/AA HU ratios: 96.0%, 100%, 95.9%, 45.5%, and 100%) in detecting LAA thrombi. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of iodine concentration (0.996; 0.898-1.000) was significantly larger than that of the LAA/AA HU ratio (0.881; 0.733-0.964) in differentiating thrombi from circulatory stasis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

DECT-derived iodine concentration was associated with improved diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional enhancement measurements in detecting LAA thrombi and differentiating thrombi from circulatory stasis in AF patients.