文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

探索和引出医疗产品生命周期中患者偏好的方法:文献综述。

Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.

机构信息

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR the Netherlands; Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR the Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC - University Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3000 CA Rotterdam.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR the Netherlands; Erasmus Choice Modelling Centre, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam, 3000 DR the Netherlands.

出版信息

Drug Discov Today. 2019 Jul;24(7):1324-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 8.


DOI:10.1016/j.drudis.2019.05.001
PMID:31077814
Abstract

Preference studies are becoming increasingly important within the medical product decision-making context. Currently, there is limited understanding of the range of methods to gain insights into patient preferences. We developed a compendium and taxonomy of preference exploration (qualitative) and elicitation (quantitative) methods by conducting a systematic literature review to identify these methods. This review was followed by analyzing prior preference method reviews, to cross-validate our results, and consulting intercontinental experts, to confirm our outcomes. This resulted in the identification of 32 unique preference methods. The developed compendium and taxonomy can serve as an important resource for assessing these methods and helping to determine which are most appropriate for different research questions at varying points in the medical product lifecycle.

摘要

偏好研究在医疗产品决策背景下变得越来越重要。目前,对于深入了解患者偏好的方法范围的理解有限。我们通过进行系统文献回顾来确定这些方法,开发了偏好探索(定性)和启发(定量)方法的纲要和分类法。在此回顾之后,我们分析了之前的偏好方法综述,以交叉验证我们的结果,并咨询了洲际专家,以确认我们的结果。这导致确定了 32 种独特的偏好方法。所开发的纲要和分类法可以作为评估这些方法的重要资源,并有助于确定在医疗产品生命周期的不同阶段针对不同研究问题最适合哪些方法。

相似文献

[1]
Methods for exploring and eliciting patient preferences in the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.

Drug Discov Today. 2019-5-8

[2]
Appraising patient preference methods for decision-making in the medical product lifecycle: an empirical comparison.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020-6-19

[3]
Eliciting Preferences in Dentistry with Multiattribute Stated Preference Methods: A Systematic Review.

JDR Clin Trans Res. 2018-10

[4]
Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.

Health Technol Assess. 2001

[5]
Factors and situations influencing the value of patient preference studies along the medical product lifecycle: a literature review.

Drug Discov Today. 2018-9-26

[6]
Quantifying benefit-risk preferences for medical interventions: an overview of a growing empirical literature.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013-8

[7]
What matters in clinical trial decision-making: a systematic review of interviews exploring cancer patients' experiences.

Scand J Caring Sci. 2019-6

[8]
Using patient values and preferences to inform the importance of health outcomes in practice guideline development following the GRADE approach.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017-5-2

[9]
Patient preferences versus physicians' judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making?

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013-6

[10]
Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.

BMJ Open. 2017-5-17

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparative Analysis of Preferences and Willingness to Pay for COVID-19 Vaccine Among Individuals With and Without Chronic Diseases: A Discrete Choice Experiment Approach.

Health Sci Rep. 2025-7-18

[2]
Research on the perspectives of people affected by dementia with Lewy bodies: a scoping review.

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025-5-26

[3]
Developing a Process for Preference Measures in Pediatric Growth Hormone Deficiency: Challenges and Solutions.

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2025-5-8

[4]
Towards Context-Specific EHDI Services: Understanding Caregivers' Priorities and Preferences in South Africa Through a Conjoint Analysis.

Child Care Health Dev. 2025-5

[5]
Generalized Pairwise Comparisons to Support Shared Decision-Making in the CODA Trial.

JAMA Netw Open. 2025-3-3

[6]
Practical applications of methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision models: a scoping review.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025-3-3

[7]
A Taxonomy for Assessing Whether HRQoL Value Sets Are Obsolete.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2025-5

[8]
Patient preferences for adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma: a discrete-choice experiment.

Future Oncol. 2025-3

[9]
Patient preferences for drug therapy in inflammatory arthritis: protocol for a living systematic review and evidence map to inform clinical practice guidelines.

BMJ Open. 2025-1-15

[10]
Working toward Personalized Intervention Advice: A Survey Study on Preference Heterogeneity in Patients with Breast Cancer-Related Fatigue.

MDM Policy Pract. 2025-1-13

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索