Institute of Applied Geosciences, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Adenauerring 20b, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2019 Jun 19;21(6):957-969. doi: 10.1039/c9em00009g.
Selenium is of special interest in different research fields due to its narrow range between beneficial and toxic effects. On a global scale, Se deficiency is more widespread. Biofortification measures have successfully been applied to specifically increase Se concentrations in food crops. Still not much is known about the behaviour and long-term fate of externally supplied Se. Over many years, natural but external selenate is regularly introduced into the soil-plant system via irrigation at our study sites in Punjab which makes it also an ideal natural analogue to investigate the long term effect of biofortification. For our study, we combined total and species specific analysis of Se in soil and plant material. Selenium is clearly enriched in all investigated topsoils (0-15 cm) with concentrations of 1.5-13.0 mg kg-1 despite similar background Se concentrations (0.5 ± 0.1 mg kg-1) below 15 cm depth. Irrigation is indicated to be the primary source of excess Se. Processes like Se species transformation, uptake by plants and plant material decomposition further influence both the Se speciation and extent of Se enrichment in the soils. The Se concentration in different plants and plant parts is alarmingly high showing concentrations of up to 738 mg kg-1 in wheat. Irrigation induced selenate can be considered as an easily available short term pool of Se for plants and thus strongly controls their total Se concentration and speciation. The long-term pool of Se in the topsoil mainly consists of selenite and organic Se species. These species are readily retained but still sufficiently mobile to be taken up by plants. The formation of elemental Se can be considered as a non-available Se pool and is thus, the major cause of Se immobilization and long-term enrichment of Se in the soils. Our study clearly shows that biofortification with selenate, despite its effectiveness, bears the risk of easily increasing Se levels in plants to toxic levels and producing food with less favourable inorganic Se species if not done with care. Excess selenate is either lost due to biomethylation or immobilized within the soil which has to be considered as highly negative from both an economic and ecological point of few.
硒由于其有益和有毒作用之间的范围狭窄,在不同的研究领域中特别受到关注。在全球范围内,硒缺乏更为普遍。生物强化措施已成功应用于专门提高粮食作物中的硒浓度。然而,对于外部供应的硒的行为和长期命运,人们知之甚少。多年来,在旁遮普的研究地点,天然但外部的硒酸盐通过灌溉定期被引入土壤-植物系统,这使其成为研究生物强化长期影响的理想天然类似物。在我们的研究中,我们结合了土壤和植物材料中硒的总量和种特异性分析。尽管在 15 厘米以下的深度下,背景硒浓度相似(0.5±0.1mgkg-1),但所有调查的表土(0-15cm)中硒的浓度明显富集,为 1.5-13.0mgkg-1。灌溉被认为是过量硒的主要来源。硒形态转化、植物吸收和植物材料分解等过程进一步影响土壤中硒的形态和硒的富集程度。不同植物和植物部分的硒浓度高得惊人,小麦中的硒浓度高达 738mgkg-1。灌溉诱导的硒酸盐可以被认为是植物可用的短期硒源,因此强烈控制它们的总硒浓度和形态。表土中硒的长期库主要由亚硒酸盐和有机硒组成。这些物质很容易被保留,但仍具有足够的移动性,可被植物吸收。元素硒的形成可以被认为是一种不可用的硒库,因此是硒固定和土壤中硒长期富集的主要原因。我们的研究清楚地表明,尽管生物强化用硒酸盐有效,但如果不小心使用,它有可能将植物中的硒水平容易地增加到毒性水平,并产生无机硒形态不太有利的食物。过量的硒酸盐要么由于生物甲基化而丢失,要么被固定在土壤中,这从经济和生态角度来看都是非常负面的。