Migally Karl, Rettiganti Mallikarjuna, Gossett Jeffrey M, Reemtsen Brian, Gupta Punkaj
1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
2 Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL, USA.
World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2019 May;10(3):261-267. doi: 10.1177/2150135118825274.
To evaluate the impact of regional cerebral perfusion (RCP) during heart operation on outcomes in neonates undergoing Norwood operation.
We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial data set. The adjusted effect of RCP use on each outcome was studied using a penalized logistic regression model with bootstrap validation.
Of 549 patients included in the study, 252 patients (45.9%) received RCP during their heart operation. In univariate comparisons, the majority of the baseline characteristics and preoperative risk factors were similar in the RCP and No RCP group. The total cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time and the total cross-clamp (CC) time were longer in the RCP group (RCP vs No RCP, median CPB time: 161 minutes vs 109 minutes; median CC time: 63 minutes vs 43 minutes). In adjusted models, the use of RCP was not associated with decreased mortality and/or need for heart transplant at hospital discharge (odds ratio [OR]: 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43-1.25) or prolonged mechanical ventilation (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.62-2.28) or prolonged hospital length of stay (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.73-2.30). We demonstrated that use of RCP was associated with longer CPB times, increased use of ultrafiltration, and higher probability of open chest after Norwood operation.
This study did not demonstrate any impact of RCP on in-hospital mortality and/or heart transplantation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and prolonged hospital length of stay among neonates undergoing Norwood operation.
评估心脏手术期间区域脑灌注(RCP)对接受诺伍德手术的新生儿预后的影响。
我们使用单心室重建试验数据集的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。使用带有自助验证的惩罚逻辑回归模型研究了RCP使用对每个结局的调整效应。
在纳入研究的549例患者中,有252例患者(45.9%)在心脏手术期间接受了RCP。在单变量比较中,RCP组和非RCP组的大多数基线特征和术前危险因素相似。RCP组的总体外循环(CPB)时间和总交叉钳夹(CC)时间更长(RCP组与非RCP组,中位CPB时间:161分钟对109分钟;中位CC时间:63分钟对43分钟)。在调整模型中,RCP的使用与出院时死亡率降低和/或心脏移植需求降低(比值比[OR]:0.73;95%置信区间[CI]:0.43 - 1.25)、机械通气时间延长(OR:1.20,95%CI:0.62 - 2.28)或住院时间延长(OR:1.30,95%CI:0.73 - 2.30)无关。我们证明,RCP的使用与更长的CPB时间、超滤使用增加以及诺伍德手术后开胸的更高概率相关。
本研究未证明RCP对接受诺伍德手术的新生儿的院内死亡率和/或心脏移植、机械通气时间延长和住院时间延长有任何影响。