Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 May 21;62(5):1278-1295. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-18-0043.
Purpose This study evaluated how 1st and 2nd vowel formant frequencies (F1, F2) differ between normal and loud speech in multiple speaking tasks to assess claims that loudness leads to exaggerated vowel articulation. Method Eleven healthy German-speaking women produced normal and loud speech in 3 tasks that varied in the degree of spontaneity: reading sentences that contained isolated /i: a: u:/, responding to questions that included target words with controlled consonantal contexts but varying vowel qualities, and a recipe recall task. Loudness variation was elicited naturalistically by changing interlocutor distance. First and 2nd formant frequencies and average sound pressure level were obtained from the stressed vowels in the target words, and vowel space area was calculated from /i: a: u:/. Results Comparisons across many vowels indicated that high, tense vowels showed limited formant variation as a function of loudness. Analysis of /i: a: u:/ across speech tasks revealed vowel space reduction in the recipe retell task compared to the other 2. Loudness changes for F1 were consistent in direction but variable in extent, with few significant results for high tense vowels. Results for F2 were quite varied and frequently not significant. Speakers differed in how loudness and task affected formant values. Finally, correlations between sound pressure level and F1 were generally positive but varied in magnitude across vowels, with the high tense vowels showing very flat slopes. Discussion These data indicate that naturalistically elicited loud speech in typical speakers does not always lead to changes in vowel formant frequencies and call into question the notion that increasing loudness is necessarily an automatic method of expanding the vowel space. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8061740.
目的 本研究评估了在多种言语任务中,第一和第二元音共振峰频率(F1、F2)在正常语音和大声语音之间的差异,以评估关于响度导致元音发音夸张的说法。 方法 11 名讲德语的健康女性在 3 项任务中以不同的自发性水平产生正常语音和大声语音:朗读包含孤立的/iː aː uː/的句子,回答包含受控制的辅音环境但元音质量不同的目标词的问题,以及完成一份食谱回忆任务。通过自然改变对话者的距离来引出响度变化。从目标词中的重读音节元音中获取第一和第二共振峰频率以及平均声压级,并从/iː aː uː/计算元音空间面积。 结果 许多元音的比较表明,高紧张元音的共振峰变化受响度影响有限。在食谱复述任务中,与其他 2 个任务相比,/iː aː uː/的元音空间减小。F1 的响度变化在方向上一致,但在程度上变化,高紧张元音的结果很少显著。F2 的结果差异较大,且经常不显著。说话者在响度和任务如何影响共振峰值方面存在差异。最后,声压级与 F1 之间的相关性通常为正,但在不同元音之间变化幅度不同,高紧张元音的斜率非常平坦。 讨论 这些数据表明,在典型说话者中自然产生的大声语音并不总是导致元音共振峰频率发生变化,并对增加响度必然是扩大元音空间的自动方法的观点提出质疑。 补充材料 https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.8061740.