Celik Derya, Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu Bahar
1 Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
2 Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019 May;37(5):269-275. doi: 10.1089/photob.2018.4533.
To compare the effects of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on lateral epicondylitis (LE). Although several authors have investigated the effects of PBMT and ESWT on LE, only one study to date has compared ESWT with PBMT. Ours is also the first study assessing patient satisfaction levels and quality of life in addition to comparing the two methods. Forty-three patients were randomly divided into two groups: 23 (mean age: 48.2 ± 9.4; 17 female, 6 male) were included in the PBMT group and 20 (mean age: 48.0 ± 9.9; 15 female, 5 male) in the ESWT group. PBMT was applied three times a week for 4 weeks, and ESWT once a week for 4 weeks. Stretching and eccentric strengthening exercises were also given to both groups as a home program. The Mayo Elbow Performance Score and disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) were used for evaluating upper extremity functions. Pain intensity was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS), and muscle strengths were also assessed using a hand-held dynamometer. The 12-Item Short Form (SF-12) Survey Physical and Mental Component Scales were used to evaluate quality of life, and the global rating of change scale to evaluate patient satisfaction. Patients were assessed before treatment and at 12-week follow-up. Improvements for elbow extension and shoulder flexion strength and for VAS movement were observed only in the PBMT group, whereas improvement of handgrip strength was present in both groups ( < 0.05). However, handgrip strength was superior in the PBMT group than in the ESWT group ( = 0.02). Both PBMT and ESWT are useful and can be used in the treatment of LE.
比较光生物调节疗法(PBMT)和体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)治疗肱骨外上髁炎(LE)的效果。尽管已有多位作者研究了PBMT和ESWT对LE的影响,但迄今为止只有一项研究比较了ESWT和PBMT。我们的研究也是第一项除比较这两种方法外,还评估患者满意度和生活质量的研究。43例患者被随机分为两组:PBMT组23例(平均年龄:48.2±9.4岁;女性17例,男性6例),ESWT组20例(平均年龄:48.0±9.9岁;女性15例,男性5例)。PBMT每周应用3次,共4周,ESWT每周1次,共4周。两组均给予伸展和离心强化锻炼作为家庭训练计划。采用梅奥肘关节功能评分和上肢、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(DASH)评估上肢功能。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度,并用手持测力计评估肌肉力量。采用12项简短健康调查问卷(SF - 12)的身体和心理成分量表评估生活质量,并用总体变化评定量表评估患者满意度。在治疗前和随访12周时对患者进行评估。仅在PBMT组观察到肘关节伸展和肩关节屈曲力量以及VAS运动评分有所改善,而两组的握力均有改善(P<0.05)。然而,PBMT组的握力优于ESWT组(P = 0.02)。PBMT和ESWT均有效,可用于治疗LE。