Suppr超能文献

2013 年至 2016 年美国基于国家监测的艰难梭菌相关性腹泻分离株对 fidaxomicin 敏感性研究。

U.S.-Based National Surveillance for Fidaxomicin Susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile-Associated Diarrheal Isolates from 2013 to 2016.

机构信息

Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00391-19. Print 2019 Jul.

Abstract

In 2011, we initiated a sentinel surveillance network to assess changes in (formerly ) antimicrobial susceptibility to fidaxomicin from 6 geographically dispersed medical centers in the United States. This report summarizes data from 2013 to 2016. isolates or toxin-positive stools from patients were referred to a central laboratory. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by agar dilution. CLSI, EUCAST, or FDA breakpoints were used, where applicable. Toxin gene profiles were characterized by multiplex PCR on each isolate. A random sample of approximately 40% of isolates, stratified by institution and year, was typed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA). Among 1,889 isolates from 2013 to 2016, the fidaxomicin MIC was 0.5 μg/ml; all isolates were inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml. There were decreases in metronidazole and vancomycin MICs over time. Clindamycin resistance remained unchanged (27.3%). An increase in imipenem resistance was observed. By 2015 to 2016, moxifloxacin resistance decreased in all centers. The proportion of BI isolates decreased from 25.5% in 2011 to 2012 to 12.8% in 2015 to 2016 ( < 0.001). The BI REA group correlated with moxifloxacin resistance (BI 84% resistant versus non-BI 12.5% resistant). Fidaxomicin MICs have not changed among isolates of U.S. origin over 5 years post licensure. There has been an overall decrease in MICs for vancomycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin, and rifampin and an increase in isolates resistant to imipenem. Moxifloxacin resistance remained high among the BI REA group, but the proportion of BI isolates has decreased. Continued geographic variations in REA groups and antimicrobial resistance persist.

摘要

2011 年,我们启动了一个哨点监测网络,以评估来自美国 6 个地理位置分散的医疗中心的(以前称为) fidaxomicin 的抗菌药物敏感性变化。本报告总结了 2013 年至 2016 年的数据。从患者的分离物或毒素阳性粪便中选择标本送至中心实验室。采用琼脂稀释法测定抗菌药物敏感性。适用时,使用 CLSI、EUCAST 或 FDA 折点。通过对每个分离物进行多重 PCR 来确定毒素基因谱。每年按机构和年份分层,从大约 40%的分离物中随机抽取样本进行限制性内切酶分析(REA)分型。在 2013 年至 2016 年的 1889 株分离物中,fidaxomicin 的 MIC 为 0.5μg/ml;所有分离物均在 ≤1μg/ml 时被抑制。甲硝唑和万古霉素 MIC 随时间推移而降低。克林霉素耐药性保持不变(27.3%)。观察到亚胺培南耐药性增加。到 2015 年至 2016 年,所有中心的莫西沙星耐药率均降低。BI 分离物的比例从 2011 年至 2012 年的 25.5%下降到 2015 年至 2016 年的 12.8%(<0.001)。BI REA 组与莫西沙星耐药性相关(BI 84%耐药,而非 BI 12.5%耐药)。fidaxomicin MIC 在美国分离物中未发生变化5 年许可后。万古霉素、甲硝唑、莫西沙星和利福平的 MIC 总体下降,亚胺培南耐药分离物增加。BI REA 组中莫西沙星耐药率仍然很高,但 BI 分离物的比例有所下降。REA 组和抗菌药物耐药性的地理差异持续存在。

相似文献

3
High in vitro activity of fidaxomicin against Clostridium difficile isolates from a university teaching hospital in China.
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2018 Jun;51(3):411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
5
A nationwide study of molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile in South Korea.
Anaerobe. 2019 Dec;60:102106. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2019.102106. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
6
Differences in the Molecular Epidemiology and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Clostridium difficile Isolates in Pediatric and Adult Patients.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jul 22;60(8):4896-900. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00714-16. Print 2016 Aug.
8
An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.
N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 8;353(23):2433-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa051590. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
9
Surveillance for antimicrobial resistance in Australian isolates of Clostridium difficile, 2013-14.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Nov;70(11):2992-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv220. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
10
Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibilities of extra-intestinal Clostridium difficile isolates.
Anaerobe. 2007 Jun-Aug;13(3-4):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Unique growth and morphology properties of Clade 5 strains revealed by single-cell time-lapse microscopy.
bioRxiv. 2025 May 16:2024.02.13.580212. doi: 10.1101/2024.02.13.580212.
4
A Review of Therapies for Infection.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Dec 31;14(1):17. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics14010017.
5
Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Is Associated With Specific Ribotypes.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Oct 10;11(11):ofae588. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae588. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Improving Infectious Disease Treatment Response via Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;13(1):51. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13010051.
9
Characterization of community-acquired strains in Israel, 2020-2022.
Front Microbiol. 2023 Dec 19;14:1323257. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1323257. eCollection 2023.
10
A US-based national surveillance study for the susceptibility and epidemiology of isolates with special reference to ridinilazole: 2020-2021.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2023 Oct 18;67(10):e0034923. doi: 10.1128/aac.00349-23. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

3
Circulation of Highly Drug-Resistant Clostridium difficile Ribotypes 027 and 001 in Two Tertiary-Care Hospitals in Mexico.
Microb Drug Resist. 2018 May;24(4):386-392. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2017.0323. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
5
Economic Burden of Clostridium difficile Infection in European Countries.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1050:1-12. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-72799-8_1.
7
The emergence of Clostridium difficile infection in Asia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of incidence and impact.
PLoS One. 2017 May 2;12(5):e0176797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176797. eCollection 2017.
8
Update on Antimicrobial Resistance in Clostridium difficile: Resistance Mechanisms and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.
J Clin Microbiol. 2017 Jul;55(7):1998-2008. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02250-16. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
9
Effects of control interventions on Clostridium difficile infection in England: an observational study.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Apr;17(4):411-421. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30514-X. Epub 2017 Jan 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验