Department of Radiology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, People's Republic of China.
Radiology Department, Shenzhen University General Hospital and Shenzhen University Clinical Medical Academy, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Aug;44(8):2679-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02013-3.
To explore the feasibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) for evaluating inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease (CD).
In all, 51 CD patients were included, who were performed with consecutive enteroscopy, MR and DKI (b values = 0-2000 mm/s). The lesions of bowel segments were graded as inactive (0-2), mild (3-6), and moderate-severe group (> 6) based on simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD), The abilities of the parameters of DKI and DWI in grading different activity lesions were compared.
One hundred and twenty-seven bowel segments including inactive (15), mild (45) and moderate-severe (67) were analyzed. ADC (r = - 0.627, p < 0.001), D (r = - 0.381, p < 0.001) and K (r = 0.641, p < 0.001) were correlated with SES-CD. These parameters were significantly different among the three groups (all p < 0.001). ROC analysis found ADC had the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.884, p < 0.001) to differentiate inactive from active group with the threshold at 0.865 × 10 mm/s, which was slightly higher than K (AUC = 0.867, p < 0.001) with the threshold at 0.645, and was obviously higher than D (AUC = 0.726, p = 0.005). Similarly, ADC also had the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.846, p < 0.001) to differentiate inactive-mild from moderate-severe group with the threshold at 0.825 × 10 mm/s, and minimally higher than K (AUC = 0.843, p < 0.001) with the threshold at 0.695, and obviously higher than D (AUC = 0.690, p < 0.001).
DKI is feasible and comparable to conventional DWI for the evaluation of inflammatory activity in CD.
探讨扩散峰度成像(DKI)评估克罗恩病(CD)炎症活动的可行性。
共纳入 51 例 CD 患者,行连续结肠镜检查、磁共振成像(MR)和 DKI(b 值=0-2000 mm/s)。根据简化克罗恩病内镜活动评分(SES-CD),将肠段病变分为非活动(0-2 分)、轻度(3-6 分)和中重度组(>6 分)。比较 DKI 和 DWI 参数在分级不同活动病变中的能力。
共分析 127 个肠段,包括非活动(15 个)、轻度(45 个)和中重度(67 个)。ADC(r=-0.627,p<0.001)、D(r=-0.381,p<0.001)和 K(r=0.641,p<0.001)与 SES-CD 相关。这些参数在三组间差异均有统计学意义(均 p<0.001)。ROC 分析发现 ADC 区分活动与非活动组的准确率最高(AUC=0.884,p<0.001),其阈值为 0.865×10 mm/s,略高于 K(AUC=0.867,p<0.001),其阈值为 0.645,明显高于 D(AUC=0.726,p=0.005),其阈值为 0.825。同样,ADC 区分非活动-轻度与中重度组的准确率也最高(AUC=0.846,p<0.001),其阈值为 0.825×10 mm/s,略高于 K(AUC=0.843,p<0.001),其阈值为 0.695,明显高于 D(AUC=0.690,p<0.001),其阈值为 0.695。
DKI 是一种可行的方法,可与常规 DWI 相媲美,用于评估 CD 的炎症活动。