Suppr超能文献

犯罪提示会逆转模拟遗忘对记忆的破坏效应吗?

Do reminders of the crime reverse the memory-undermining effect of simulating amnesia?

机构信息

Department of Education, Psychology, Communication, University of Bari A. Moro, Bari, Italy.

Forensic Psychology Section, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2019 Oct;47(7):1375-1385. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00939-z.

Abstract

Research shows that simulating amnesia impairs actual memory for a mock crime. Lack of rehearsal has been suggested as the most likely explanation for this finding because feigning amnesia is linked to reduced thinking about the offence. We investigated whether reminders about the crime could reverse the memory-undermining effect of simulation. In two studies, participants watched a video of a violent crime. After, they were asked to either simulate amnesia or confess the crime. During the week between the first and second memory test phase, participants were provided with reminders of the crime in two different modalities. In Study 1 (pilot), participants received frames of the mock crime video via WhatsApp. Findings showed that such reminders did not enhance ex-simulators' memory. In Study 2, participants were asked to put sequences of the mock crime in the right order. This latter modality led to enhanced memory for the offence in simulating participants. Theoretical and practical implications of our findings for the legal field are discussed.

摘要

研究表明,模拟健忘症会损害对模拟犯罪的实际记忆。由于假装健忘与减少对犯罪的思考有关,因此 rehearsal 不足被认为是最有可能的解释。我们调查了是否可以通过提醒犯罪来逆转模拟对记忆的破坏效应。在两项研究中,参与者观看了一段暴力犯罪的视频。之后,他们被要求模拟健忘症或坦白罪行。在第一次和第二次记忆测试之间的一周内,参与者通过两种不同的方式获得了犯罪的提醒。在研究 1(试点)中,参与者通过 WhatsApp 接收模拟犯罪视频的帧。研究结果表明,此类提醒并不能增强前模拟者的记忆。在研究 2 中,参与者被要求将模拟犯罪的序列按正确的顺序排列。这种方式在后模拟者中增强了对犯罪的记忆。讨论了我们的研究结果对法律领域的理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2388/6800869/3d7ea59bffb3/13421_2019_939_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验