University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Oct;44(5):659-674. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12850. Epub 2019 May 17.
Gentamicin is often used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Due to pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric patients, appropriate dosing of gentamicin in the paediatric population is challenging. This article reviews published population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients, identifies covariates that significantly influence gentamicin pharmacokinetics, and determines whether there is a consensus on proposed dosing for intravenous gentamicin in this population.
The PubMed database was searched for articles published until the end of 2017. If the articles described population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in the paediatric population (after intravenous administration of gentamicin), the following data were extracted: type of study, year of publication, population characteristics and number of patients, gentamicin dosing, total number of gentamicin (serum and/or plasma) concentrations, type of population modelling approach, developed model with pharmacokinetic parameters and covariates included.
In most of the studies, one- or two-compartment modelling was applied. The mean estimated gentamicin clearance for newborns, infants and the complete paediatric population was 0.048, 0.13 and 0.067 L/h/kg, respectively, and the mean predicted volume of distribution was 0.475, 0.35 and 0.33 L/kg, respectively. The values reflect differences in body composition and kidney maturation within the different paediatric populations. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were most influenced by age, body size and renal function.
Based on our review, the authors agree on a prolonged dosing interval for preterm and term newborns (up to 48 hours). However, there was no agreement on proposed dosing with respect to gestational age. In general, the proposed daily doses were lower compared to those initially applied for preterm newborns and comparable to those for term newborns. For infants and children, the dosing interval remained unchanged (24 hours), but the proposed daily doses were higher than actually applied. When differences in the paediatric population are considered and an appropriate population PK model with applicable covariates is applied, dosing can be individualized. In the future, studies of gentamicin pharmacokinetics in paediatric patients should focus on currently underestimated covariates, such as fat-free mass, concomitantly administered drugs, body temperature and critical illness because these can change gentamicin PK considerably. Consequently, different dosing is required and TDM becomes even more important.
庆大霉素常用于治疗革兰氏阴性感染。由于儿科患者药代动力学的可变性,因此为儿科患者适当给药庆大霉素具有挑战性。本文综述了已发表的儿科患者庆大霉素群体药代动力学模型,确定了对庆大霉素药代动力学有显著影响的协变量,并确定了是否就该人群静脉内给予庆大霉素的建议剂量达成共识。
在 PubMed 数据库中搜索截至 2017 年底发表的文章。如果文章描述了儿科人群(静脉给予庆大霉素后)的庆大霉素群体药代动力学模型,则提取以下数据:研究类型、发表年份、人群特征和患者数量、庆大霉素剂量、庆大霉素(血清和/或血浆)浓度的总数、群体建模方法的类型、纳入药代动力学参数和协变量的开发模型。
在大多数研究中,应用了单室或双室模型。新生儿、婴儿和整个儿科人群的平均估计庆大霉素清除率分别为 0.048、0.13 和 0.067 L/h/kg,平均预测分布容积分别为 0.475、0.35 和 0.33 L/kg,这些数值反映了不同儿科人群中身体成分和肾功能的差异。庆大霉素药代动力学受年龄、体型和肾功能的影响最大。
根据我们的综述,作者同意对早产儿和足月新生儿(长达 48 小时)延长给药间隔。但是,对于胎龄,没有关于建议剂量的共识。一般来说,与最初用于早产儿的剂量相比,建议的日剂量较低,与足月儿的剂量相当。对于婴儿和儿童,给药间隔保持不变(24 小时),但建议的日剂量高于实际应用。当考虑儿科人群的差异并应用适用的协变量的适当群体 PK 模型时,可以实现个体化给药。在未来,应关注目前被低估的协变量(如无脂肪量、同时给予的药物、体温和危重病)的儿科患者庆大霉素药代动力学研究,因为这些因素会极大地改变庆大霉素 PK。因此,需要不同的剂量,TDM 变得更加重要。