Laboratório de Ecologia Aquática e Laboratório de Ecologia de Bentos, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Laboratório de Ecologia Aquática e Laboratório de Ecologia de Bentos, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, Campina Grande, Brazil.
Water Res. 2019 Aug 1;159:262-273. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.04.057. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
Geoengineering techniques have been used to control phosphorus and cyanobacteria in lakes promising greater and quicker chemical and ecological recovery. Techniques that use coagulants and clays to remove particulates and dissolved phosphorus from the water column have received great. In this study, bench-scale "flock & sink" assays were carried out to evaluate the efficiency of the coagulants aluminium sulphate (SUL), polyaluminium chloride (PAC) and chitosan (CHI), alone and combined with natural bentonite clays (BEN) and lanthanum-modified bentonite (LMB), to remove of phosphorus from a eutrophic reservoir in a semi-arid region of Brazil. In addition, the study seeks to assess the effects on the cyanobacteria density and the intra- and extracellular concentrations of cyanotoxins after the application of these geoengineering materials. The SUL and PAC coagulants effectively reduced the total phosphorus (TP), reactive soluble phosphorus (SRP), turbidity, chlorophyll-a, cyanobacteria density and intracellular microcystin, whereas CHI showed a low removal efficiency. Lanthanum-modified bentonite proved to be more effective than BEN; however, the application of the coagulants only was sufficient to successfully remove phosphorus and cyanobacteria from the water column. In addition, the efficiency of the "flock & sink" technique in cell removal varied among the cyanobacteria species. Small colonial species such as Aphanocapsa delicatissima, Merismopedia glauca and Merismopedia tenuissima were removed regardless of the treatment used, including those with CHI and BEN. As for the filamentous cyanobacteria, Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii, Geitlerinema amphibium, Planktothrix agardhii and Pseudanabaena catenata, removal was achieved only using PAC, SUL and LMB alone or when combined. The intracellular concentrations of saxitoxin and cylindrospermopsin and the extracellular fraction of these cyanotoxins and of microcystin were not influenced by the application of coagulants and clays. This indicates that cell lysis did not occur with the addition of the geoengineering materials. These results demonstrate that the "flock & sink" technique could be used for restoration of eutrophic waters.
地球工程技术已被用于控制湖泊中的磷和蓝藻,以实现更大和更快的化学和生态恢复。使用混凝剂和粘土从水柱中去除颗粒物和溶解磷的技术受到了广泛关注。在这项研究中,进行了台式“絮凝沉降”试验,以评估单独使用和与天然膨润土粘土(BEN)和镧改性膨润土(LMB)组合使用时,硫酸铝(SUL)、聚合氯化铝(PAC)和壳聚糖(CHI)等混凝剂去除巴西半干旱地区富营养化水库中磷的效率。此外,该研究还旨在评估应用这些地球工程材料后对蓝藻密度和细胞内外蓝藻毒素浓度的影响。SUL 和 PAC 混凝剂有效地降低了总磷(TP)、反应性可溶性磷(SRP)、浊度、叶绿素-a、蓝藻密度和细胞内微囊藻毒素,而 CHI 表现出较低的去除效率。镧改性膨润土比 BEN 更有效;然而,仅应用混凝剂就足以成功地从水柱中去除磷和蓝藻。此外,“絮凝沉降”技术在细胞去除方面的效率因蓝藻物种而异。小型殖民物种,如 Aphanocapsa delicatissima、Merismopedia glauca 和 Merismopedia tenuissima,无论使用何种处理方法,包括使用 CHI 和 BEN,都被去除。至于丝状蓝藻,Cylindrospermopsis raciborskii、Geitlerinema amphibium、Planktothrix agardhii 和 Pseudanabaena catenata,只有单独使用 PAC、SUL 和 LMB 或组合使用时才能去除。细胞内的石房蛤毒素和柱孢藻毒素浓度以及这些蓝藻毒素和微囊藻毒素的细胞外部分的浓度不受混凝剂和粘土的应用影响。这表明添加地球工程材料不会导致细胞裂解。这些结果表明,“絮凝沉降”技术可用于富营养化水的恢复。