Suppr超能文献

老年护理服务中痴呆症患者疼痛记录的探索

An Exploration of Pain Documentation for People Living with Dementia in Aged Care Services.

作者信息

Andrews Sharon M, Dipnall Joanna F, Tichawangana Rumbidzai, Hayes Kathryn J, Fitzgerald Janna Anneke, Siddall Philip, Poulos Christopher, Cunningham Colm

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.

Pre-hospital Emergency and Trauma Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Pain Manag Nurs. 2019 Oct;20(5):475-481. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 May 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pain in people with dementia is a common occurrence. Providing evidence-based pain management for people with dementia in residential aged care services is imperative to providing quality care. However, it remains unclear from current research how various aged care staff (Registered Nurses (RNs), Enrolled Nurses (ENs), Personal Care Assistants (PCAs)) engage at specific points of the pain management pathway. With structural changes to the residential aged care workforce over the past two decades, understanding the relative contributions of these aged care staff to pain management practices is crucial for future practice development.

AIM

To investigate the quality and completeness of pain documentation for people living with dementia, and assess the extent to aged care staff are engaged in documentation processes.

DESIGN

A three-month retrospective documentation audit.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The audit was conducted on the files of 114 residents with moderate to very severe dementia, across four Australian residential aged care facilities.

METHODS

Data was collected on each resident's pain profile (n=114). One hundred and sixty-nine (169) pain episodes were audited for quality and completeness of pain documentation and the extent to which aged care staff (RNs/ENs and PCAs) were engaged in the documentation of pain management.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine percent of pain episodes had no documentation about how resident pain was identified and only 22% of the episodes contained an evidence-based (E-B) assessment. At least one intervention was documented for 89% of the pain episodes, the majority (68%) being non-pharmacological. Only 8% of pain episodes had an E-B evaluation reported. Thirteen percent (13%) of episodes contained information across all four pain management domains (Identification/ problems, assessment, intervention and evaluation). Documentation by PCAs was evident at all points in the pain management pathway. PCAs were responsible for considerately more episodes of assessment (50% vs 18%) compared to nursing staff.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Despite the high prevalence of pain in people with dementia in aged care settings, current pain management documentation does not reflect best practice standards. Future capacity building initiatives must engage PCAs, as key stakeholders in pain management, with support and clinical leadership of nursing staff.

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者疼痛很常见。在老年护理机构为痴呆症患者提供循证疼痛管理对于提供优质护理至关重要。然而,目前的研究仍不清楚各类老年护理人员(注册护士(RN)、登记护士(EN)、个人护理助理(PCA))在疼痛管理路径的特定环节是如何参与的。在过去二十年里,老年护理劳动力结构发生了变化,了解这些老年护理人员对疼痛管理实践的相对贡献对于未来的实践发展至关重要。

目的

调查痴呆症患者疼痛记录的质量和完整性,并评估老年护理人员参与记录过程的程度。

设计

为期三个月的回顾性记录审核。

地点和参与者

审核了澳大利亚四个老年护理机构中114名中重度至极重度痴呆症患者的档案。

方法

收集每位居民的疼痛情况(n = 114)。对169次疼痛发作的疼痛记录质量和完整性以及老年护理人员(注册护士/登记护士和个人护理助理)参与疼痛管理记录的程度进行了审核。

结果

29%的疼痛发作没有关于如何识别患者疼痛的记录,只有22%的发作包含循证(E - B)评估。89%的疼痛发作记录了至少一种干预措施,其中大多数(68%)为非药物干预。只有8%的疼痛发作报告了循证评估。13%的发作包含了所有四个疼痛管理领域(识别/问题、评估、干预和评估)的信息。个人护理助理在疼痛管理路径的各个环节都有记录。与护理人员相比,个人护理助理负责的评估发作明显更多(50%对18%)。

结论及临床意义

尽管老年护理机构中痴呆症患者疼痛发生率很高,但目前的疼痛管理记录并未反映最佳实践标准。未来的能力建设举措必须让作为疼痛管理关键利益相关者的个人护理助理参与进来,并得到护理人员的支持和临床指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验