Jagric Tomaz, Ilijevec Bojan, Velenik Vaneja, Ocvirk Janja, Potrc Stojan
Department for Abdominal and General Surgery, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Radiol Oncol. 2019 May 8;53(2):245-255. doi: 10.2478/raon-2019-0019.
Background To determine the effects of perioperative treatment of gastric cancer patients, we conducted an analysis with propensity score matched patient groups to determine the role of perioperative chemotherapy in patients after D2 lymphadenectomy. Patients and methods From our database of 1563 patients, 482 patients were selected with propensity score matching and divided into two balanced groups: 241 patients in the surgery only group and 241 patients in the perioperative group. The long-term results of treatment were compared between the two groups. Results Most of the included patients received radio-chemotherapy with capecitabine (n = 111; 46%) and perioperative chemotherapy with epirubicin, oxalliplatin and capecitabine (n = 91; 37.7%). 92.9% of the patients received a D2 lymph node dissection. Perioperative morbidity was similar between surgery only (18.3%) and perioperative treatment groups (20.7%) (p = 0.537). The perioperative mortality was not influenced by perioperative treatment. A pathological response was observed in 12.5% of patients. The overall 5-year and median survivals were significantly higher in the perioperative treatment group (50.5%; 51.7 moths) compared to surgery only group (41.8%; 34.9 months; p = 0.038). The subgroup analysis revealed that only patients with the TNM stages T3 (p = 0.028), N2 (p = 0.009), N3b (p = 0.043), and UICC stages IIIb (p = 0.003) and IIIc (p = 0.03) significantly benefit from perioperative treatment. Conclusions Perioperative treatment in radically resected gastric cancer patients after D2 lymphadenectomy was beneficial in stages IIIb and IIIc. The effects of perioperative treatment in lower stages could be negated by the effects of the radical surgery in lower stages and in higher stages by the biology of the disease.
背景 为了确定胃癌患者围手术期治疗的效果,我们对倾向评分匹配的患者组进行了分析,以确定围手术期化疗在D2淋巴结清扫术后患者中的作用。
患者与方法 从我们1563例患者的数据库中,通过倾向评分匹配选择了482例患者,并将其分为两个平衡组:单纯手术组241例患者和围手术期治疗组241例患者。比较两组的长期治疗结果。
结果 大多数纳入患者接受了卡培他滨的放化疗(n = 111;46%)以及表柔比星、奥沙利铂和卡培他滨的围手术期化疗(n = 91;37.7%)。92.9%的患者接受了D2淋巴结清扫。单纯手术组(18.3%)和围手术期治疗组(20.7%)的围手术期发病率相似(p = 0.537)。围手术期死亡率不受围手术期治疗的影响。12.5%的患者观察到病理反应。围手术期治疗组的总体5年生存率和中位生存期(50.5%;51.7个月)显著高于单纯手术组(41.8%;34.9个月;p = 0.038)。亚组分析显示,只有TNM分期为T3(p = 0.028)、N2(p = 0.009)、N3b(p = 0.043)以及UICC分期为IIIb(p = 0.003)和IIIc(p = 0.03)的患者从围手术期治疗中显著获益。
结论 D2淋巴结清扫术后的根治性切除胃癌患者,围手术期治疗对IIIb期和IIIc期患者有益。围手术期治疗在较低分期的效果可能被低分期根治性手术的效果抵消,而在较高分期则可能被疾病生物学特性抵消。