Lee Sunghee, Fredriksen-Goldsen Karen I, McClain Colleen, Kim Hyun-Jun, Suzer-Gurtekin Z Tuba
Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Field methods. 2018 Aug;30(3):208-224. doi: 10.1177/1525822X18777736. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
One of the implicit assumptions in survey research is lower response rates by sexual minorities than non-minorities. With rapidly changing public attitudes towards same-sex marriage, we reconsider this assumption. We used data from the 2013 and 2014 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) that include contact history data for all sample families (n=117,589) as well as sexual orientation information about adults sampled from responding families (n=71,110). We created proxy nonresponse indicators based on contact efforts and reluctance from contact history data and linked them to sexual orientation of the sample adult and simulated nonresponse. The data did not support the assumption: straight adults were more difficult to get cooperation from than non-straights. With female sexual minorities showing higher nonresponse than the male counterpart, special considerations are required. Replication analyses may provide insights into what factors influence study participation decisions, which will inform how nonresponse may impact the accuracy of research findings.
调查研究中一个隐含的假设是,性少数群体的回应率低于非少数群体。随着公众对同性婚姻的态度迅速转变,我们重新审视这一假设。我们使用了2013年和2014年美国国家健康访谈调查(NHIS)的数据,这些数据包括所有样本家庭(n = 117,589)的联系历史数据以及从回应家庭中抽取的成年人的性取向信息(n = 71,110)。我们根据联系历史数据中的联系努力和不情愿程度创建了代理无回应指标,并将它们与样本成年人的性取向相关联,模拟无回应情况。数据并不支持这一假设:异性恋成年人比非异性恋者更难获得合作。女性性少数群体的无回应率高于男性性少数群体,对此需要特别考虑。重复分析可能会揭示哪些因素影响研究参与决策,这将为无回应如何影响研究结果的准确性提供信息。