Hsieh Shu-Hui, Lee Shen-Ming, Li Chin-Shang, Tu Su-Hao
Center for Survey Research, Research Center for Humanities and Social Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Statistics, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Stat Methods Appt. 2016 Nov;25(4):601-621. doi: 10.1007/s10260-016-0351-1. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
The randomized response technique (RRT) is an important tool that is commonly used to protect a respondent's privacy and avoid biased answers in surveys on sensitive issues. In this work, we consider the joint use of the unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (J Am Stat Assoc 64:520-539, 1969) and the related-question RRT of Warner (J Am Stat Assoc 60:63-69, 1965) dealing with the issue of an innocuous question from the unrelated-question RRT. Unlike the existing unrelated-question RRT of Greenberg et al. (1969), the approach can provide more information on the innocuous question by using the related-question RRT of Warner (1965) to effectively improve the efficiency of the maximum likelihood estimator of Scheers and Dayton (J Am Stat Assoc 83:969-974, 1988). We can then estimate the prevalence of the sensitive characteristic by using logistic regression. In this new design, we propose the transformation method and provide large-sample properties. From the case of two survey studies, an extramarital relationship study and a cable TV study, we develop the joint conditional likelihood method. As part of this research, we conduct a simulation study of the relative efficiencies of the proposed methods. Furthermore, we use the two survey studies to compare the analysis results under different scenarios.
随机应答技术(RRT)是一种重要工具,常用于保护应答者隐私,并在敏感问题调查中避免有偏差的回答。在本研究中,我们考虑联合使用格林伯格等人(《美国统计协会杂志》64:520 - 539,1969年)的无关问题随机应答技术以及华纳(《美国统计协会杂志》60:63 - 69,1965年)的相关问题随机应答技术,以处理无关问题随机应答技术中无害问题的情况。与格林伯格等人(1969年)现有的无关问题随机应答技术不同,该方法通过使用华纳(1965年)的相关问题随机应答技术,可以提供更多关于无害问题的信息,从而有效提高舍尔和代顿(《美国统计协会杂志》83:969 - 974,1988年)最大似然估计量的效率。然后,我们可以使用逻辑回归估计敏感特征的流行率。在这个新设计中,我们提出了变换方法并给出了大样本性质。从两项调查研究的案例,即婚外情研究和有线电视研究中,我们开发了联合条件似然方法。作为本研究的一部分,我们对所提出方法的相对效率进行了模拟研究。此外,我们使用这两项调查研究来比较不同场景下的分析结果。