Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia Università di Parma, UO Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy.
Nephron. 2019;142(3):227-232. doi: 10.1159/000500498. Epub 2019 May 20.
The increasing need for kidney grafts has led to a progressive expansion in the selection criteria for deceased and living donors (LDs). While concerns regarding the use of organs from suboptimal deceased donors relate to the quality of the graft, donation from "marginal" LDs may pose potential harm to the donor. Subject of Review: Living kidney donation is a safe procedure, but is associated with a small risk of end-stage kidney disease in the long- term. When elderly subjects and those with comorbidities are considered, long-term post-donation data are missing, making decisions regarding donation from these populations challenging. Further, vague guidelines have led to a wide heterogeneity in the criteria for living donation from marginal donors across centers and individuals. A recent survey by Lafranca et al. [PLoS One 2017;12:e0181846] collected information from 331 members (mainly physicians) of the European Society of Transplantation regarding several expanded LD criteria. Median refusal rate for potential expanded criteria (ECD) LDs is 15% and the authors found significant differences across regions in Europe in the acceptance of donors with ECD. Some transplant specialists did also deviate from their own transplant center policy, mainly to consider donors with high body mass index. Second Opinion: The survey by Lafranca et al. [PLoS One 2017;12:e0181846] documents extreme variability in the criteria for marginal LD selection. Many centers are deviating from the few agreed upon guideline criteria and are considering individuals with hypertension and minors for kidney donation. Intriguingly, one-fourth of the surgeons even deviate occasionally from center policy, especially when the issue is donor obesity. By and large, these data indicate that transplant community has a generally open approach toward extension of criteria for living donation, but long-term follow-up studies are needed to draw solid conclusions and guidelines.
对肾移植物的需求不断增加,导致对已故和活体供者(LDs)的选择标准逐步扩大。虽然人们对使用来自次优已故供者的器官的质量存在担忧,但来自“边缘”LDs 的捐献可能会对供者造成潜在危害。
活体肾捐献是一种安全的手术,但长期来看,与终末期肾病的风险相关。当考虑到老年患者和合并症患者时,长期的捐赠后数据缺失,使得这些人群的捐赠决策具有挑战性。此外,模糊的指导方针导致了各个中心和个人之间从边缘供者进行活体捐献的标准存在很大的异质性。最近,Lafranca 等人进行了一项调查 [PLoS One 2017;12:e0181846],该调查从欧洲移植学会的 331 名成员(主要是医生)那里收集了有关几个扩展 LD 标准的信息。对潜在扩展标准(ECD)LDs 的中位数拒绝率为 15%,作者发现欧洲各地区在接受 ECD 供者方面存在显著差异。一些移植专家确实也偏离了自己移植中心的政策,主要是考虑接受体重指数较高的供者。
Lafranca 等人的调查 [PLoS One 2017;12:e0181846] 记录了边缘 LD 选择标准的极端变异性。许多中心正在偏离少数商定的指南标准,并考虑为高血压患者和未成年人进行肾脏捐献。有趣的是,四分之一的外科医生甚至偶尔会偏离中心政策,特别是在涉及供者肥胖的问题时。总的来说,这些数据表明,移植界对活体捐献标准的扩展普遍持开放态度,但需要进行长期的随访研究,以得出可靠的结论和指南。