Department of Neurology, New York Langone Medical Center, New York, NY.
Department of Neurology, the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
J Neuroimaging. 2019 Sep;29(5):640-644. doi: 10.1111/jon.12630. Epub 2019 May 21.
Studies have shown an association between infarct patterns and recurrent stroke in patients with symptomatic intracranial stenosis (sICAS) but there are limited data on associations with perfusion imaging mismatch profile. We aim to determine the association between infarct pattern, optimal mismatch profile definition, and recurrent cerebrovascular events (RCVE) in patients with anterior circulation sICAS.
This is a retrospective study of consecutive patients with acutely sICAS admitted to a comprehensive stroke center over 18 month's period. Patients with sICAS underwent magnetic resonance perfusion (MRP) imaging within 24 hours from admission. Infarct patterns (internal BZ [IBZ], cortical BZ [CBZ], and core/perforator [C/P]) and RCVE within 90 days, were independently adjudicated by two reviewers. We compared mismatch profiles and recurrent event rates across infarct patterns.
Twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria; 28% had IBZ infarcts and overall RCVE rate was 32.0%. When compared to patients without IBZ infarcts, those with IBZ infarcts were more likely to have a target mismatch profile using T > 6 seconds (60% vs. 6.7%, P = .007) and RCVE (62.5% vs. 11.8%, P = .01). There were no associations between CBZ and C/P infarcts and target mismatch profiles and RCVE.
IBZ infarcts may be a surrogate marker of distal perfusion status and RCVE risk. Larger multicenter, prospective, core-lab blindly adjudicated studies are needed to confirm our findings.
研究表明,症状性颅内狭窄(sICAS)患者的梗死模式与复发性卒中之间存在关联,但与灌注成像不匹配模式相关的数据有限。我们旨在确定前循环 sICAS 患者的梗死模式、最佳不匹配模式定义与复发性脑血管事件(RCVE)之间的关系。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 18 个月内在综合卒中中心急性 sICAS 入院的连续患者。sICAS 患者在入院后 24 小时内接受磁共振灌注(MRP)成像。梗死模式(内部脑区低灌注区[IBZ]、皮质脑区低灌注区[CBZ]和核心/穿支区[C/P])和 90 天内的 RCVE 由两名评审员独立判定。我们比较了不同梗死模式下的不匹配模式和复发事件率。
25 例患者符合纳入标准;28%的患者存在 IBZ 梗死,总的 RCVE 发生率为 32.0%。与无 IBZ 梗死的患者相比,IBZ 梗死患者更可能采用 T > 6 秒的目标不匹配模式(60%比 6.7%,P =.007),RCVE 发生率也更高(62.5%比 11.8%,P =.01)。CBZ 和 C/P 梗死与目标不匹配模式和 RCVE 之间无关联。
IBZ 梗死可能是远端灌注状态和 RCVE 风险的替代标志物。需要更大规模、多中心、前瞻性、核心实验室盲法评估的研究来证实我们的发现。