Waterbury Glenn Thomas
Tom Waterbury, Center for Assessment and Research Studies, MSC 6806, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA,
J Appl Meas. 2019;20(2):154-166.
This simulation study explores the effects of missing data mechanisms, proportions of missing data, sample size, and test length on the biases and standard errors of item parameters using the Rasch measurement model. When responses were missing completely at random (MCAR) or missing at random (MAR), item parameters were unbiased. When responses were missing not at random (MNAR), item parameters were severely biased, especially when the proportion of missing responses was high. Standard errors were primarily affected by sample size, with larger samples associated with smaller standard errors. Standard errors were inflated in MCAR and MAR conditions, while MNAR standard errors were similar to what they would have been, had the data been complete. This paper supports the conclusion that the Rasch model can handle varying amounts of missing data, provided that the missing responses are not MNAR.
本模拟研究使用拉施测量模型探讨了缺失数据机制、缺失数据比例、样本量和测试长度对项目参数偏差和标准误差的影响。当回答完全随机缺失(MCAR)或随机缺失(MAR)时,项目参数无偏差。当回答非随机缺失(MNAR)时,项目参数存在严重偏差,尤其是当缺失回答的比例较高时。标准误差主要受样本量影响,样本量越大,标准误差越小。在MCAR和MAR条件下标准误差会膨胀,而MNAR标准误差与数据完整时的情况相似。本文支持这样的结论:只要缺失回答不是MNAR,拉施模型就能处理不同数量的缺失数据。