Miller Michele A, Buss Peter, Sylvester Tashnica Taime, Lyashchenko Konstantin P, deKlerk-Lorist Lin-Mari, Bengis Roy, Hofmeyr Markus, Hofmeyr Jennifer, Mathebula Nomkhosi, Hausler Guy, Helden Paul van, Stout Eliza, Parsons Sven D C, Olea-Popelka Francisco
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence for Biomedical Tuberculosis Research, South African Medical Research Council Centre for TB Research, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town 8000, South Africa.
Veterinary Wildlife Services, Kruger National Park, Private Bag X402.
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2019 Mar 1;50(1):7-15. doi: 10.1638/2017-0187.
Bovine tuberculosis (bTB), caused by infection, causes morbidity and mortality in free-ranging lions in bTB-endemic areas of South Africa. However, the only currently used diagnostic test is the tuberculin skin test (TST). This test is logistically challenging to perform because it requires immobilization of lions twice in a 72-hr period. Blood-based diagnostic tests, such as serological assays, have been previously reported for detection in lion populations, and have the advantage of only requiring a single immobilization. In addition, serological assays can be used for retrospective testing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to test free-ranging lions with the STAT-PAKt (Chembio Diagnostics Systems, Medford, NY 11763, USA) and DPPt VetTB (Chembio Diagnostics Systems) serological assays and compare those results with the tuberculin skin test. The serological assays were also used to determine prevalence in bTB-endemic and uninfected lion populations. The results showed that the serological assays could distinguish between culture-positive and -negative lions. In addition, antigen-specific humoral responses were present in lions that had clinical signs of bTB disease or were shedding antemortem. Although the seroprevalence of infection in Kruger National Park lions was similar to that obtained from antemortem mycobacterial culture (4.8 and 3.3%, respectively), it was less than that estimated by the TST (72%). These findings support the hypothesis that assays based on cell-mediated immune responses are more sensitive than serology is in detecting infection in lions. However, serological assays can have a role in bTB disease detection in lions and are especially useful for retrospective studies.
牛结核病(bTB)由感染引起,在南非牛结核病流行地区的野生狮子中会导致发病和死亡。然而,目前唯一使用的诊断测试是结核菌素皮肤试验(TST)。由于该测试需要在72小时内将狮子固定两次,在后勤方面具有挑战性。此前已有报道称,基于血液的诊断测试,如血清学检测,可用于狮子群体中的检测,其优势在于只需要一次固定。此外,血清学检测可用于回顾性检测。因此,本研究的目的是使用STAT-PAKt(美国纽约州梅德福市Chembio诊断系统公司,邮编11763)和DPPt VetTB(Chembio诊断系统公司)血清学检测方法对野生狮子进行检测,并将结果与结核菌素皮肤试验进行比较。血清学检测还用于确定牛结核病流行地区和未感染狮子群体中的患病率。结果表明,血清学检测能够区分培养阳性和阴性的狮子。此外,在有牛结核病临床症状或生前排菌的狮子中存在抗原特异性体液反应。尽管克鲁格国家公园狮子中牛分枝杆菌感染的血清阳性率与生前分枝杆菌培养获得的结果相似(分别为4.8%和3.3%),但低于结核菌素皮肤试验估计的结果(72%)。这些发现支持了以下假设:基于细胞介导免疫反应的检测方法在检测狮子感染方面比血清学检测更敏感。然而,血清学检测在狮子牛结核病的检测中可以发挥作用,尤其对回顾性研究很有用。