Department of Orthopedics, Korea University Hospital, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Sep;129:e191-e198. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.05.094. Epub 2019 May 20.
In thoracolumbar (TL) burst fractures, vertebral body height loss (VBHL) indicates the degree of instability and constitutes one of the decision criteria for surgical treatment. However, the relative reliability and variability of different measurement techniques for VBHL are unknown. We compared the reliability of different methods used to assess VBHL.
A total of 144 patients with TL burst fractures were included, and lateral radiographs were taken twice at an interval of 2 weeks, which were examined by 3 observers. The measurement methods used included the anterior/posterior vertebral body height compression ratio (APCR), anterior height compression percentage (AHCP), and anterior/posterior vertebral body height compression ratio percentage. To compare the accuracy of measurements according to vertebral degeneration, subjects were divided into 2 groups based on the median age of 50 years.
In intraobserver comparisons, the APCR method showed a higher inter- and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (>0.714) compared with the other methods. In interobserver comparisons, the ICC of the APCR (>0.793) was excellent. In intraobserver comparisons of the aged >50-years group, only the APCR method showed an excellent ICC (>0.753), whereas the AHCP method showed a fair to good ICC, and the anterior/posterior vertebral body height compression ratio percentage method had the lowest ICC. In interobserver comparisons of the aged >50-years group, the APCR and AHCP methods showed excellent ICCs. In the aged ≤50-years group, all 3 methods showed similar fair to good ICC values.
Based on comparative reliability analyses, we recommend the APCR method as the first-line technique and the AHCP as an alternative technique for measuring VBHL in TL burst fractures.
在胸腰椎(TL)爆裂性骨折中,椎体高度丢失(VBHL)表明了不稳定的程度,并构成了手术治疗的决策标准之一。然而,VBHL 的不同测量技术的相对可靠性和可变性尚不清楚。我们比较了评估 VBHL 的不同方法的可靠性。
共纳入 144 例 TL 爆裂性骨折患者,在 2 周间隔时拍摄侧位 X 线片,由 3 名观察者进行检查。使用的测量方法包括前后椎体高度压缩比(APCR)、前高压缩百分比(AHCP)和前后椎体高度压缩比百分比。为了根据椎体退变比较测量的准确性,根据 50 岁的中位数将受试者分为 2 组。
在观察者内比较中,APCR 方法的组内和组间相关系数(ICC)均高于其他方法(>0.714)。在观察者间比较中,APCR 的 ICC 非常高(>0.793)。在年龄>50 岁的观察者内比较中,只有 APCR 方法的 ICC 非常高(>0.753),而 AHCP 方法的 ICC 为良好至优秀,前后椎体高度压缩比百分比方法的 ICC 最低。在年龄>50 岁的观察者间比较中,APCR 和 AHCP 方法的 ICC 非常高。在年龄≤50 岁的组中,所有 3 种方法的 ICC 值均相似,为良好至优秀。
基于比较可靠性分析,我们建议将 APCR 方法作为首选技术,AHCP 方法作为 TL 爆裂性骨折 VBHL 测量的替代技术。