Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Sep-Oct;9(5):e465-e472. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 22.
Despite the importance of brachytherapy in the curative treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, reviews of practice patterns in the United States have identified a decline in brachytherapy use in clinically appropriate patient populations. A survey of radiation oncologists identified lack of time and lack of guidance as barriers. To address these barriers, the purpose of this study was to develop a simulation-based educational (SBE) gynecologic brachytherapy workshop.
The SBE gynecologic brachytherapy workshop was developed with expertise from 2 institutions, combining procedural simulation with a practical discussion of brachytherapy applicator insertion techniques. The primary outcome was feasibility of workshop deployment, defined as completion of all workshop components in the time allotted. Preworkshop and postworkshop surveys were also administered to assess efficacy, a secondary outcome.
The workshop took place at a national radiation oncology meeting, and all workshop components were completed in the 2 hours allotted. SBE stations focused on (1) fiducial placement, (2-3) applicator selection, (4) suturing, and (5) pelvic examination and applicator placement. Fourteen participants completed surveys. Respondents included residents and attending physicians. More than 50% of respondents were from academic practices and practiced gynecologic brachytherapy weekly or more. Curricular objectives for this workshop were for ≥20% trainees to report increased confidence in practice and ≥20% of trainees to report increased familiarity with applicators. After participation in the workshop, confidence in applicator choice improved in 9 of 13 participants (69%), confidence in complication management improved in 8 of 13 participants (62%), and familiarity with applicators improved in 7 of 13 participants (54%). These differences were statistically significant at α = .05.
This study demonstrated feasibility in using simulation for gynecologic brachytherapy education at a national meeting. Although most respondents were experienced in brachytherapy, more than half reported increased confidence and familiarity with aspects of the procedure after the workshop. Future work should address interstitial needle placement and improved time management of workshop stations.
尽管近距离放射治疗在局部晚期宫颈癌的治疗中具有重要意义,但对美国实践模式的审查发现,在临床适宜的患者群体中,近距离放射治疗的应用有所减少。一项针对放射肿瘤学家的调查发现,缺乏时间和缺乏指导是障碍。为了解决这些障碍,本研究旨在开发一种基于模拟的妇科近距离放射治疗教育(SBE)研讨会。
SBE 妇科近距离放射治疗研讨会由来自 2 个机构的专家共同开发,将程序模拟与近距离放射治疗施源器插入技术的实际讨论相结合。主要结果是研讨会部署的可行性,定义为在规定时间内完成所有研讨会组成部分。还进行了会前和会后调查,以评估疗效,这是次要结果。
该研讨会在全国放射肿瘤学会议上举行,所有研讨会组成部分都在规定的 2 小时内完成。SBE 站重点关注(1)基准点放置、(2-3)施源器选择、(4)缝合和(5)盆腔检查和施源器放置。14 名参与者完成了调查。受访者包括住院医师和主治医生。超过 50%的受访者来自学术实践,每周或更多次进行妇科近距离放射治疗。本研讨会的课程目标是≥20%的学员报告在实践中增加信心,≥20%的学员报告增加对施源器的熟悉程度。参加研讨会后,13 名参与者中有 9 名(69%)对施源器选择的信心增强,13 名参与者中有 8 名(62%)对并发症管理的信心增强,13 名参与者中有 7 名(54%)对施源器的熟悉程度增强。这些差异在 α=0.05 时具有统计学意义。
本研究在全国会议上展示了使用模拟进行妇科近距离放射治疗教育的可行性。尽管大多数受访者在近距离放射治疗方面经验丰富,但超过一半的人报告在研讨会后对该程序的某些方面增加了信心和熟悉程度。未来的工作应该解决间质针放置和提高研讨会站的时间管理。