Suppr超能文献

感染性心内膜炎中的急性缺血性卒中治疗:病例系列与系统评价

Acute Ischemic Stroke Therapy in Infective Endocarditis: Case Series and Systematic Review.

作者信息

Marquardt Robert J, Cho Sung-Min, Thatikunta Prateek, Deshpande Abhishek, Wisco Dolora, Uchino Ken

机构信息

Cerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Cerebrovascular Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Departments of Neurology, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Aug;28(8):2207-2212. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.04.039. Epub 2019 May 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) therapy in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or endovascular therapy (EVT) such as mechanical thrombectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent AIS therapy with IVT or EVT at a tertiary referral center from 2013 to 2017, that were later diagnosed with acute IE as the causative mechanism. We then performed a systematic review of reports of acute ischemic reperfusion therapy in IE since 1995 for their success rates in terms of neurological outcome, and mortality, and their risk of hemorrhagic complication.

RESULTS

In the retrospective portion, 8 participants met criteria, of whom 4 received IVT and 4 received EVT. Through systematic review, 24 publications of 32 participants met criteria. Combined, a total of 40 participants were analyzed: 18 received IVT alone, 1 received combined IVT plus EVT, and 21 received EVT alone. IVT compared to EVT were similar in rates of good neurologic outcomes (58% versus 76%, P= .22) and mortality (21% versus 19%, P= .87), but had higher post-therapy intracranial hemorrhage (63% versus 18% [P= .006]).

CONCLUSION

IV thrombolysis has a higher rate of post-therapy intracranial hemorrhage compared to EVT. EVT should be considered as first-line AIS therapy for patients with known, or suspected, IE who present with a large vessel occlusion.

摘要

目的

评估感染性心内膜炎(IE)患者接受急性缺血性卒中(AIS)治疗(静脉溶栓[IVT]或血管内治疗[EVT],如机械取栓)的安全性。

方法

我们对2013年至2017年在一家三级转诊中心接受IVT或EVT治疗AIS且后来被诊断为急性IE是病因机制的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。然后,我们对自1995年以来IE急性缺血再灌注治疗报告进行了系统评价,以了解其神经学结局、死亡率的成功率以及出血并发症风险。

结果

在回顾性部分,8名参与者符合标准,其中4名接受IVT,4名接受EVT。通过系统评价,32名参与者的24篇出版物符合标准。综合起来,共分析了40名参与者:18名仅接受IVT,1名接受IVT加EVT联合治疗,21名仅接受EVT。IVT与EVT相比,良好神经学结局的发生率(58%对76%,P = 0.22)和死亡率(21%对19%,P = 0.87)相似,但治疗后颅内出血发生率更高(63%对18%[P = 0.006])。

结论

与EVT相比,IV溶栓治疗后颅内出血发生率更高。对于已知或疑似IE且出现大血管闭塞的患者,应考虑将EVT作为AIS的一线治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验