Edwardson Matthew A, Ding Li, Park Caron, Lane Christianne J, Nelsen Monica A, Wolf Steven L, Winstein Carolee J, Dromerick Alexander W
Department of Neurology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Center for Brain Plasticity and Recovery, Georgetown University and MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, DC, United States.
Front Neurol. 2019 May 8;10:454. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00454. eCollection 2019.
Research imaging costs limit lesion-based analyses in already expensive large stroke rehabilitation trials. Despite the belief that lesion characteristics influence recovery and treatment response, prior studies have not sufficiently addressed whether lesion features are an important consideration in motor rehabilitation trial design. Using clinically-obtained neuroimaging, evaluate how lesion characteristics relate to upper extremity (UE) recovery and response to therapy in a large UE rehabilitation trial. We reviewed lesions from 297 participants with mild-moderate motor impairment in the Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Arm Rehabilitation Evaluation (ICARE) study and their association with motor recovery, measured by the UE Fugl-Meyer (UE-FM). Significant lesion features identified on correlational and bivariate analysis were further analyzed for associations with recovery and therapy response using longitudinal mixed models. Prior radiographic stroke was associated with less recovery on UE-FM in participants with motor impairment from subsequent subcortical stroke (-5.8 points) and in the overall sample (-3.6 points), but not in participants with cortical or mixed lesions. Lesion volume was also associated with less recovery, particularly after subcortical stroke. Every decade increase in age was associated with 1 less point of recovery on UE-FM. Response to specific treatment regimens varied based on lesion characteristics. Subcortical stroke patients experienced slightly less recovery with higher doses of upper extremity task-oriented training. Participants with cortical or mixed lesions experienced more recovery with higher doses of usual and customary therapy. Other imaging features (leukoaraiosis, ischemic vs. hemorrhagic stroke) were not significant. ICARE clinical imaging revealed information useful for UE motor trial design: stratification of persons with and without prior radiographic stroke may be required in participants with subcortical stroke, the majority of motor rehabilitation trial participants. Most of the prior radiographic strokes were small and cortically-based, suggesting even minor prior brain injury remote to the acute stroke lesion may limit spontaneous and therapy-related recovery. Lesion location may be associated with response to different therapy regimens, but the effects are variable and of unclear significance.
在本就成本高昂的大型中风康复试验中,研究成像成本限制了基于病灶的分析。尽管人们认为病灶特征会影响恢复情况和治疗反应,但先前的研究尚未充分探讨病灶特征在运动康复试验设计中是否是一个重要的考虑因素。在一项大型上肢康复试验中,利用临床获取的神经影像,评估病灶特征与上肢(UE)恢复情况以及治疗反应之间的关系。我们在多学科综合手臂康复评估(ICARE)研究中,回顾了297名轻度至中度运动障碍参与者的病灶,以及这些病灶与通过上肢Fugl-Meyer(UE-FM)量表测量的运动恢复之间的关联。在相关性和双变量分析中确定的显著病灶特征,使用纵向混合模型进一步分析其与恢复情况和治疗反应的关联。先前有影像学记录的中风与后续皮质下中风导致运动障碍的参与者(-5.8分)以及总体样本(-3.6分)的UE-FM恢复较差有关,但在有皮质或混合病灶的参与者中并非如此。病灶体积也与恢复较差有关,尤其是在皮质下中风后。年龄每增加十岁,UE-FM恢复分数就减少1分。对特定治疗方案的反应因病灶特征而异。皮质下中风患者在接受更高剂量的上肢任务导向训练时,恢复情况略差。有皮质或混合病灶的参与者在接受更高剂量的常规治疗时,恢复情况更好。其他影像特征(脑白质疏松、缺血性中风与出血性中风)并不显著。ICARE临床影像揭示了对UE运动试验设计有用的信息:在大多数运动康复试验参与者、患有皮质下中风的参与者中,可能需要对有或没有先前影像学记录中风的人员进行分层。大多数先前有影像学记录的中风较小且基于皮质,这表明即使是远离急性中风病灶的轻微先前脑损伤也可能限制自发恢复和与治疗相关的恢复。病灶位置可能与对不同治疗方案的反应有关,但效果各异且意义不明。