Department of Molecular Biology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany; Institute of Psychopharmacology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Department of Molecular Biology, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
Behav Brain Res. 2019 Oct 3;371:111979. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.111979. Epub 2019 May 26.
Sign tracking (ST) is a complex Pavlovian trait that is known to impact instrumental behaviour. Recent work suggests that this trait also correlates with altered top-down executive control relative to goal tracking (GT) rats. This raises the question as to the extent to which both phenotypes differ in executive functions. Moreover, it is unclear which cognitive processes might cause potential differences between ST and GT rats. We therefore compared the behaviour of ST and GT rats in several assays, such as outcome devaluation, attentional set shifting and reversal learning, conditional responding, as well as delayed alternation to measure different aspects of executive functioning. Goal-directed behaviour per se was not different between ST and GT rats in the outcome devaluation task. ST rats performed slightly better than GT rats in one condition of the set shifting task (place->cue shift) and the delayed alternation task, but did not perform as well in the conditional responding task. Thus, differential behavioural performance between ST and GT rats was dependent on the specific task context. Further, we found evidence that the differences in executive functions are likely related to increased incentive salience attribution and impulsive action in ST rats.
标记跟踪(ST)是一种复杂的巴甫洛夫特质,已知会影响工具性行为。最近的研究表明,与目标跟踪(GT)大鼠相比,这种特质也与自上而下的执行控制的改变相关。这就提出了一个问题,即这两种表型在执行功能方面有多大程度的不同。此外,尚不清楚哪些认知过程可能导致 ST 和 GT 大鼠之间存在潜在差异。因此,我们比较了 ST 和 GT 大鼠在几种测定中的行为,例如结果贬值、注意定势转移和反转学习、条件反应以及延迟交替,以测量执行功能的不同方面。在结果贬值任务中,ST 和 GT 大鼠本身的目标导向行为没有差异。在定势转移任务(位置->线索转移)和延迟交替任务的一种条件下,ST 大鼠的表现略优于 GT 大鼠,但在条件反应任务中的表现不如 GT 大鼠。因此,ST 和 GT 大鼠之间的行为表现差异取决于特定的任务环境。此外,我们有证据表明,执行功能的差异可能与 ST 大鼠中激励显著性归因和冲动行为的增加有关。