U M Puneeth, Bhatia Rohit, Sreenivas Vishnubhatla, Singh Nishita, Joseph Rimpy, Dash Deepa, Singh Rajesh Kumar, Tripathi Manjari, Srivastava M V Padma, Singh Man Mohan, Suri Ashish, Prasad Kameshwar
Departments of Neurology, Cardiac & Neurosciences Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
Departments of Neurology, Cardiac & Neurosciences Centre, AIIMS, New Delhi, India.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2019 Aug;28(8):2213-2220. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.05.003. Epub 2019 Jul 10.
Prognostic scores help in predicting mortality and functional outcome post intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We aimed to validate the ICH and ICH-GS scores in a cohort of Indian patients with ICH and observe the impact of any surgical intervention on prognostication.
This was an ambispective observational study of primary ICH cases enrolled between January 2014 and April 2018. Observed mortality on ICH and ICH GS scores for the entire cohort and individually for the medically and surgically managed patients was compared to the published mortality in the original derivation cohorts.
617 patients, (464 retrospective and 153 prospective) of ICH were included. In hospital mortality and 30-day mortality was 28.7% and 28.5% respectively. There was a significant association of increasing mortality with increasing ICH and ICH-GS scores. Area under receiver operating characteristic curve for 30-day mortality was 75.9% and 74.1% for ICH and ICH-GS scores respectively. However, mortality observed at individual scores was significantly less than previously reported. Among the surgically intervened patients (n = 265), both the expected mortality at baseline and discriminative ability of ICH and ICH-GS scores for 30-day mortality was significantly reduced following surgical intervention (ROC in surgically intervened groups: 59.9 (52.6-67.2) and 63(56-70) for ICH and ICH-GS scores respectively).
Although ICH and ICH-GS scores are valid in Indian population, mortality at individual scores is lower than previously reported. Mortality prediction using ICH and ICH GS scores is significantly modified by surgical interventions. Thus, newer prognostic tools which incorporate surgical intervention need to be developed and validated in future.
预后评分有助于预测脑出血(ICH)后的死亡率和功能结局。我们旨在对一组印度脑出血患者的ICH和ICH-GS评分进行验证,并观察任何手术干预对预后的影响。
这是一项对2014年1月至2018年4月期间纳入的原发性ICH病例的前瞻性观察研究。将整个队列以及分别接受药物治疗和手术治疗的患者的ICH和ICH GS评分的观察死亡率与原始推导队列中公布的死亡率进行比较。
纳入了617例ICH患者(464例回顾性病例和153例前瞻性病例)。住院死亡率和30天死亡率分别为28.7%和28.5%。死亡率随ICH和ICH-GS评分的增加而显著相关。ICH和ICH-GS评分的30天死亡率的受试者操作特征曲线下面积分别为75.9%和74.1%。然而,在各个评分下观察到的死亡率显著低于先前报道的水平。在接受手术干预的患者(n = 265)中,手术干预后,基线时的预期死亡率以及ICH和ICH-GS评分对30天死亡率的鉴别能力均显著降低(手术干预组中ICH和ICH-GS评分的ROC分别为59.9(52.6 - 67.2)和63(56 - 70))。
尽管ICH和ICH-GS评分在印度人群中有效,但各个评分下的死亡率低于先前报道。手术干预显著改变了使用ICH和ICH GS评分进行的死亡率预测。因此,未来需要开发并验证纳入手术干预的更新预后工具。