Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Lindleya 4, 02-005, Warsaw, Poland.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Jul;51(7):1089-1099. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02183-5. Epub 2019 Jun 1.
Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) instillations are considered as a gold standard of therapy in high- and intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Unfortunately, up to 40% of patients might experience treatment failure and even 15% of patients initially diagnosed with NMIBC will progress to muscle-invasive disease. Since patients, who fail to respond to BCG, are at particular risk of progression, immediate radical cystectomy (RC) is currently recommended to provide cancer control. However, immunotherapy in NMIBC management still evolves. Immune checkpoint inhibitors emerge as new immunotherapeutics, which in the future might be combined with BCG and may serve as an alternative to radical cystectomy in patients, who failed to respond to BCG alone or are at particular a priori risk of BCG failure, especially if RC is not a safe option. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify NMIBC patients that will not benefit from BCG therapy and demand radical cystectomy. In the following review, we attempt to focus on several clinical and molecular factors and demonstrate the efforts directed to unravel their significance in BCG-failure risk assessment.
卡介苗(BCG)灌注被认为是高风险和中风险非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的标准治疗方法。不幸的是,多达 40%的患者可能会经历治疗失败,甚至最初诊断为 NMIBC 的 15%的患者会进展为肌肉浸润性疾病。由于对 BCG 无反应的患者特别有进展的风险,目前建议立即进行根治性膀胱切除术(RC)以提供癌症控制。然而,NMIBC 管理中的免疫疗法仍在不断发展。免疫检查点抑制剂作为新的免疫疗法出现,它们将来可能与 BCG 联合使用,并可能成为对单独 BCG 无反应或对 BCG 失败的特殊先验风险的患者的替代治疗方法,特别是如果 RC 不是一种安全的选择。因此,迫切需要识别不会从 BCG 治疗中受益且需要进行根治性膀胱切除术的 NMIBC 患者。在下面的综述中,我们试图关注几个临床和分子因素,并展示为阐明它们在 BCG 失败风险评估中的意义所做的努力。