Madhu S Gayathri, James Emmanuel, Venu Rama P
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Amrita School of Pharmacy, Amrita VishwaVidyapeetham University, AIMS Health Sciences Campus, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Department of Gastroenterology, Amrita Institute of Medical sciences, Amrita VishwaVidyapeetham University, AIMS Health Sciences Campus, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2016 Sep;23(5):283-287. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000818. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
To assess antibiotic usage in gastrointestinal disorders with respect to appropriateness, pattern of resistance, and incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
Antibiotic prescribing in the gastroenterology department of a tertiary care hospital was evaluated using the Gyssens criteria and also by assessing drug related problems (DRPs) using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe V.6.2. A total of 173 patients were studied prospectively by a team of clinical pharmacists. Antibiotic susceptibility was prospectively studied; in addition, retrospective data on culture and sensitivity reports of commonly isolated organisms from 1 October 2012 to 30 September 2014 were collected to determine the resistance pattern in previous years. ADRs were evaluated using the Naranjo scale.
Antibiotic therapy was appropriate in 60% of patients and inappropriate in the remaining patients due to incorrect decision, choice, and use. A total of 184 DRPs and 30 ADRs of antibiotics were identified. In the study patients, the most commonly isolated organism was (27.3%) followed by (16.7%). Both and exhibited 100% resistance towards cefotaxime. There was an increase in the resistance of and against various antibiotics tested in 2013-2014 as compared to the previous year. An empirical antibiotic policy was developed which was endorsed by the gastroenterology department.
Although antibiotic therapy was appropriate in the majority of patients, irrational use occurred due to incorrect choice, improper dosage, and improper duration of therapy. and isolates showed an increase in resistance towards various antibiotics tested.
评估胃肠道疾病中抗生素的使用情况,包括合理性、耐药模式及药物不良反应(ADR)的发生率。
采用吉森标准对一家三级医院胃肠病科的抗生素处方进行评估,并使用欧洲药学保健网络V.6.2评估药物相关问题(DRP)。一组临床药师对173例患者进行了前瞻性研究。前瞻性研究抗生素敏感性;此外,收集2012年10月1日至2014年9月30日常见分离菌的培养和药敏报告的回顾性数据,以确定前几年的耐药模式。使用纳伦霍量表评估ADR。
60%的患者抗生素治疗合理,其余患者因决策、选择和使用不当而不合理。共识别出184个DRP和30例抗生素ADR。在研究患者中,最常见的分离菌是(27.3%),其次是(16.7%)。和对头孢噻肟均表现出100%耐药。与上一年相比,2013 - 2014年检测的和对各种抗生素的耐药性有所增加。制定了一项经验性抗生素政策,并得到了胃肠病科的认可。
虽然大多数患者的抗生素治疗是合理的,但由于选择不当、剂量不当和治疗时间不当,仍存在不合理使用的情况。和分离株对检测的各种抗生素的耐药性有所增加。