Suppr超能文献

临床药师干预对一家拥有164张床位的小型医院抗菌药物使用的影响。

Impact of clinical pharmacist intervention on antimicrobial use in a small 164-bed hospital.

作者信息

Mas-Morey Pedro, Ballesteros-Fernández Alfonso, Sanmartin-Mestre Elisabet, Valle Marta

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Hospital Quirón Salud Palmaplanas, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònomade Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Mar;25(e1):e46-e51. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001307. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To study the impact of clinical pharmacist interventions (PIs) on antimicrobial prescriptions in terms of physician acceptance rates, clinical benefits and antimicrobial use/cost outcomes.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analysed the impact of antimicrobial PIs over a 2-year period (October 2012 to October 2014) in a private non-teaching 164-bed hospital without a formal antimicrobial stewardship programme. Excluded from the study were outpatients and patients admitted to the intensive care unit or the emergency department. The PIs focused on appropriate indication and appropriate dosage; drug adverse events, allergies, intolerance and interactions; sequential therapy; therapeutic de-escalation; excessive duration of treatment and therapeutic drug monitoring. Carbapenems and linezolid were classified as special-vigilance drugs. Amoxicillin-clavulanic, piperacillin-tazobactam and vancomycin were classified as preferred drugs. Clinical benefits evaluated in accordance with internal guidelines, were classified as enhancing appropriate antimicrobial prescription or potentially reducing toxicity. Antimicrobial use and expenditure were compared with that of the previous 2-year period.

RESULTS

386 PIs were implemented in 303 patients. The overall acceptance rate was 83.4%. The acceptance rate for appropriate prescription PIs was significantly lower than for toxicity PIs (73.7% vs 90.9%; p<0.0001). Significant reductions in the use of special-vigilance drugs (from 39.9 (22.2-86.0) to 28.0 (6.0-43.4) defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 patient-days; p=0.0003) were seen and increases in the use of piperacillin-tazobactam (from 13.2 (0-22.9) to 17.2 (6.9-44.8) DDD/1000 patient-days; p=0.007) and of cephalosporins (from 123.5 (61.8-196.6) to 149.1 (80.3-228.2) DDD/1000 patient-days; p=0.027). Overall cost savings were 5.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

PIs on antimicrobial prescriptions may be effective in enhancing appropriate use of antimicrobials, reducing their toxicity, reducing the use of special-vigilance drugs and reducing overall antimicrobial cost.

摘要

目的

从医生接受率、临床益处以及抗菌药物使用/成本结果方面,研究临床药师干预(PI)对抗菌药物处方的影响。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了一家拥有164张床位的私立非教学医院在2年期间(2012年10月至2014年10月)抗菌药物PI的影响,该医院没有正式的抗菌药物管理计划。门诊患者以及入住重症监护病房或急诊科的患者被排除在研究之外。PI聚焦于适应证恰当和剂量恰当;药物不良事件、过敏、不耐受及相互作用;序贯治疗;降阶梯治疗;治疗疗程过长以及治疗药物监测。碳青霉烯类和利奈唑胺被归类为特殊监测药物。阿莫西林-克拉维酸、哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和万古霉素被归类为首选药物。根据内部指南评估的临床益处被归类为增强抗菌药物处方的恰当性或潜在降低毒性。将抗菌药物的使用和支出与前一个2年期间进行比较。

结果

对303例患者实施了386次PI。总体接受率为83.4%。恰当处方PI的接受率显著低于毒性PI(73.7%对90.9%;p<0.0001)。特殊监测药物的使用显著减少(从39.9(22.2 - 86.0)限定日剂量(DDD)/1000患者日降至28.0(6.0 - 43.4)DDD/1000患者日;p = 0.0003),哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(从13.2(0 - 22.9)增至17.2(6.9 - 44.8)DDD/ .007)以及头孢菌素(从123.5(61.8 - 196.6)增至149.1(80.3 - 228.2)DDD/1000患者日;p = 0.027)的使用增加。总体成本节省了5.1%。

结论

抗菌药物处方的PI可能在增强抗菌药物的恰当使用、降低其毒性、减少特殊监测药物的使用以及降低抗菌药物总体成本方面有效。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验