First Department of Internal Medicine, Laikon General Hospital.
Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Melanoma Res. 2020 Apr;30(2):206-208. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000627.
New primary melanomas (NPMs) in the era of combination treatments for melanoma constitute a challenge for physicians, especially due to the increased incidence of NPMs in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. We present the unique case of a patient that developed an invasive NPM while under treatment with a combination of vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab. A 39-year-old white male was treated with vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab for a stage IV (T0, N3, M1) BRAF-V600E mutated malignant melanoma in the context of a clinical trial. Eight months from treatment initiation he was diagnosed with an NPM on his back that was found to be BRAF-wild type and neuroblastoma ras mutated, while he was in complete remission. Wide excision of the lesion followed, and the patient was not withdrawn from study treatment. Twenty-two months from treatment initiation, he is still in complete remission. NPMs are a well-known adverse effect of BRAF inhibitors and pose a challenge for the treating physician since these lesions are BRAF-wild type and usually have aggressive biologic behaviour. Invasive NPMs require an aggressive management strategy with clear guidelines to prevent the emergence of advanced or metastatic disease. The emergence of invasive NPMs in patients treated with triple regimens with BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors and PD1/PDL1 inhibitors is at least unexpected and constitutes a therapeutic stalemate for the physician. Through this case report, we aim to increase awareness about the diagnosis and management of patients with NPM and to express our concerns regarding further management of NPMs in patients under triple combination treatment.
新出现的原发性黑色素瘤(NPM)在黑色素瘤联合治疗时代对医生构成了挑战,尤其是在接受 BRAF 抑制剂治疗的患者中 NPM 发病率增加的情况下。我们报告了一位特殊患者的病例,该患者在接受维莫非尼、考比替尼和阿替利珠单抗联合治疗期间发展为侵袭性 NPM。一位 39 岁的白人男性,在临床试验背景下接受维莫非尼、考比替尼和阿替利珠单抗治疗 IV 期(T0、N3、M1)BRAF-V600E 突变恶性黑色素瘤。治疗开始后 8 个月,他被诊断出背部有一处 NPM,该 NPM 为 BRAF 野生型和神经母细胞瘤 ras 突变型,同时他处于完全缓解状态。对病变进行广泛切除,并未停止研究治疗。治疗开始后 22 个月,他仍处于完全缓解状态。NPM 是 BRAF 抑制剂的一种已知不良反应,对治疗医生构成挑战,因为这些病变为 BRAF 野生型,通常具有侵袭性生物学行为。侵袭性 NPM 需要积极的管理策略,并制定明确的指南,以防止出现晚期或转移性疾病。接受 BRAF/丝裂原活化蛋白激酶激酶抑制剂和 PD1/PDL1 抑制剂三联方案治疗的患者出现侵袭性 NPM 的情况至少是出乎意料的,这对医生来说是一个治疗僵局。通过本病例报告,我们旨在提高对 NPM 患者的诊断和管理的认识,并对接受三联方案治疗的 NPM 患者的进一步管理表示关注。