Flores-Mendoza Carmen, Escorial Sergio, Herrero Oscar, Colom Roberto
Department of Psychology-Laboratory of the Individual Differences Assessment, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Antonio Carlos, 6627-Pampulha, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Department of Methodology, Faculty of Psychology, Universidad Complutense, Av. Séneca, 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Intell. 2018 Jul 9;6(3):31. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6030031.
Here we analyze the simultaneous relationships among five variables. Two refer to childhood (episodes of various forms of maltreatment and externalizing behaviors), whereas three refer to early adulthood (intelligence, personality, and socialization difficulties). The 120 individuals considered for the present report were invited from the 650 schoolchildren participating in the Longitudinal Study of Intelligence and Personality (Minas Gerais, Brazil). The complete sample was recruited in 2002 (T1; mean age = 10.0; standard deviation (SD) = 2.2) and 120 were tested again in 2014-17 (T2; mean age = 23.5; SD = 2.2). Externalizing behaviors were registered at T1, whereas the remaining variables were obtained at T2. These were the main results: (1) externalizing behaviors predict future social effectiveness (as estimated by the general factor of personality derived from the NEO Personality Inventory-Revised (NEO-PI-R) and socialization difficulties computed from the socialization scale (SOC)) and future intelligence performance (as assessed by a set of fluid and crystallized tests); (2) episodes of self-reported childhood maltreatment predict social effectiveness, but not intelligence; (3) maltreatment and externalizing behaviors are unrelated; and (4) social effectiveness (personality) and intelligence are unrelated. Therefore, the findings support the dissociation between adult intelligence and personality with respect to maltreatment episodes and externalizing behaviors occurring in childhood. Implications of these findings for social policies aimed at preventing adult socially ineffective personalities are underscored.
在此,我们分析五个变量之间的同步关系。其中两个变量涉及童年时期(各种形式的虐待经历和外化行为),而另外三个变量涉及成年早期(智力、人格和社交困难)。本报告所考虑的120名个体是从参与智力与人格纵向研究(巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州)的650名学童中邀请而来的。完整样本于2002年招募(T1;平均年龄 = 10.0;标准差(SD)= 2.2),并于2014 - 2017年再次对120名个体进行测试(T2;平均年龄 = 23.5;SD = 2.2)。外化行为在T1时记录,而其余变量在T2时获取。主要结果如下:(1)外化行为可预测未来的社会效能(由修订后的大五人格量表(NEO - PI - R)得出的人格一般因素和根据社交量表(SOC)计算出的社交困难来估计)以及未来的智力表现(通过一系列流体智力和晶体智力测试进行评估);(2)自我报告的童年虐待经历可预测社会效能,但不能预测智力;(3)虐待经历与外化行为无关;(4)社会效能(人格)与智力无关。因此,这些发现支持了在童年期发生的虐待经历和外化行为方面,成人智力与人格之间的分离。强调了这些发现对旨在预防成人社会效能低下人格的社会政策的影响。