Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195578. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5578.
Hyperactivity in the subgenual cingulate cortex (SGC) is associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) and anticorrelated with activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). This association was found to be predictive of responsiveness to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment. Such findings suggest that DLPFC-SGC connectivity is important for understanding both the therapeutic mechanism of rTMS in patients with MDD and the underlying pathophysiology of MDD.
To evaluate SGC hyperactivity in patients with MDD before and after rTMS treatment.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this diagnostic study, among participants recruited from the adult and geriatric mood and anxiety services at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, who had participated in a randomized clinical trial, baseline SGC activity of patients with MDD was compared with healthy controls. In patients with MDD, SGC activity was compared before and after active or sham high-frequency rTMS treatment. Data collection started in July 2008 and concluded in March 2012. Neurophysiological data analysis started in January 2017 and ended in May 2018.
Hyperactivity in the SGC before and after rTMS treatment was measured. Subgenual cingulate cortex hyperactivity activity was quantified using significant current density (SCD), and effective connectivity between the left DLPFC and SGC was computed using significant current scattering (SCS). Both measures were computed around TMS evoked potentials standard peak latencies prior to rTMS and after rTMS treatment, comparing patients with MMD treated with active and sham rTMS. Patients with MDD were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.
Of 121 patients with MDD in the initial trial, 30 (15 [50.0%] women) were compared with 30 healthy controls (15 [50.0%] women) at rTMS treatment baseline. The mean (SD) age of the cohort with MDD was 39.1 (10.9) years, and the mean (SD) age of healthy controls was 37.0 (11.0) years. Following rTMS treatment, 26 patients with MDD who had active rTMS treatment (21.5%) were compared with 17 patients with MDD who had sham treatment (14.0%). At baseline, the SGC mean (SD) SCD and mean (SD) SCS at 200 milliseconds after TMS pulse were higher in participants with MDD compared with healthy controls (SCD: 1.04 × 10-6 [1.41 × 10-6] μA/mm2 vs 3.8 × 10-7 [7.8 × 10-7] μA/mm2; z = -2.95; P = .004; SCS: 0.87 [0.86] mm vs 0.54 [0.87] mm; z = -2.27; P = .02). Baseline source current density was able to classify MDD with 77% accuracy. Scores on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were correlated with current density at the SGC (ρ = 0.41; P = .03). After rTMS treatment, SGC mean (SD) SCD and mean (SD) SCS at 200 milliseconds after rTMS pulse were attenuated to approximately the standard TMS-evoked potential latencies in the active rTMS group compared with the sham rTMS group (SCD: 1.57 × 10-7 [3.67 × 10-7] μA/mm2 vs 7.00 × 10-7 [7.51 × 10-7] μA/mm2; z = -2.91; P = .004; SCS: 0.20 [0.44] mm vs 0.74 [0.73] mm; z = -2.78; P = .006). Additionally, the SGC SCS change was correlated with symptom improvement on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression in the active rTMS group (ρ = 0.58; P = .047).
The findings of this study further implicate left DLPFC-SGC effective connectivity and SGC excitability in the pathophysiology of MDD and treatment with rTMS. These findings suggest that DLPFC-SGC connectivity may be a marker of rTMS treatment responsiveness.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01515215.
扣带回皮质亚区(SGC)的活动过度与重度抑郁症(MDD)有关,与背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)的活动呈负相关。这种相关性被发现可以预测重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗的反应性。这些发现表明,DLPFC-SGC 连接对于理解 rTMS 治疗 MDD 患者的治疗机制以及 MDD 的潜在病理生理学都很重要。
在 rTMS 治疗前后评估 MDD 患者的 SGC 过度活动。
设计、地点和参与者:在这项诊断性研究中,参与者来自加拿大安大略省多伦多成瘾和心理健康中心的成人和老年情绪和焦虑服务中心,他们参加了一项随机临床试验,将 MDD 患者的 SGC 基线活性与健康对照组进行了比较。在 MDD 患者中,比较了活跃和假 rTMS 治疗前后的 SGC 活性。数据采集于 2008 年 7 月开始,2012 年 3 月结束。神经生理数据分析于 2017 年 1 月开始,2018 年 5 月结束。
测量 rTMS 治疗前后的 SGC 过度活动。使用显著电流密度(SCD)量化 SGC 过度活跃,使用显著电流散射(SCS)计算左 DLPFC 和 SGC 之间的有效连接。在 rTMS 治疗前和治疗后,比较 MMD 患者接受活跃和假 rTMS 治疗的情况,使用 SCD 和 SCS 来计算 TMS 诱发电位标准峰潜伏期前后的 SGC 活动。MDD 患者使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表 17 项进行评估。
在最初的试验中,121 名 MDD 患者中有 30 名(15 名女性)与 30 名健康对照组(15 名女性)进行了 rTMS 治疗基线比较。MDD 队列的平均(SD)年龄为 39.1(10.9)岁,健康对照组的平均(SD)年龄为 37.0(11.0)岁。rTMS 治疗后,26 名接受活跃 rTMS 治疗的 MDD 患者(21.5%)与 17 名接受假 rTMS 治疗的 MDD 患者(14.0%)进行了比较。在基线时,与健康对照组相比,MDD 患者的 SGC 平均(SD)SCD 和 TMS 脉冲后 200 毫秒时的平均(SD)SCS 更高(SCD:1.04×10-6[1.41×10-6]μA/mm2 与 3.8×10-7[7.8×10-7]μA/mm2;z=-2.95;P=0.004;SCS:0.87[0.86]mm 与 0.54[0.87]mm;z=-2.27;P=0.02)。基线源电流密度能够以 77%的准确率分类 MDD。汉密尔顿抑郁量表 17 项评分与 SGC 的电流密度呈正相关(ρ=0.41;P=0.03)。rTMS 治疗后,与假 rTMS 组相比,活跃 rTMS 组的 SGC 平均(SD)SCD 和 rTMS 脉冲后 200 毫秒时的平均(SD)SCS 衰减至接近标准 TMS 诱发电位潜伏期(SCD:1.57×10-7[3.67×10-7]μA/mm2 与 7.00×10-7[7.51×10-7]μA/mm2;z=-2.91;P=0.004;SCS:0.20[0.44]mm 与 0.74[0.73]mm;z=-2.78;P=0.006)。此外,SGC 的 SCS 变化与活跃 rTMS 组汉密尔顿抑郁量表 17 项评分的改善呈正相关(ρ=0.58;P=0.047)。
这项研究的结果进一步表明,左 DLPFC-SGC 的有效连接和 SGC 的兴奋性与 MDD 的病理生理学以及 rTMS 治疗有关。这些发现表明,DLPFC-SGC 连接可能是 rTMS 治疗反应性的标志物。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01515215。