Suppr超能文献

真实临床实践中,医院转介后戒烟热线参与率及影响因素分析。

Prevalence and predictors of quitline enrollment following hospital referral in real-world clinical practice.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Kansas, 1122 W. Campus Road, Lawrence, KS 66045, United States of America.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America; University of Kansas Cancer Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd., Kansas City, KS 66160, United States of America.

出版信息

J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019 Jun;101:25-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2019.03.008. Epub 2019 Mar 23.

Abstract

Tobacco quitlines are effective, and work best for callers who receive three or more counseling sessions. Clinical settings are adopting quitline referral as a method for providing cessation support but little is known regarding enrollment and engagement following these referrals. We used data from quitline fax-back reports to describe enrollment and treatment engagement of 878 hospitalized patients who smoke who were referred via secure email to quitline at discharge. We compared patient demographics, tobacco characteristics, and treatment engagement between those enrolled and not enrolled. We conducted chi-square and t-tests to determine which variables should be included in a logistic regression to determine predictors of quitline enrollment. We did not receive fax-back reports for 25% (n = 221) of referred patients; these were excluded from all but the intent-to-treat analysis. Among patients for whom we received reports, 20.4% enrolled and accepted at least one service from the quitline. Among the 79.6% (n = 523) of patients who smoke not enrolled, most (78.3%; n = 410) were classified by the quitline as unreachable. Age (p = .006), smoking within 30 min of waking (p = .005), and interest in quitting (p = .008) were significant predictors of quitline enrollment. Using an intent to treat analysis, 11.4% (n = 100) of all referred patients were enrolled and accepted a single or multi-call programs; 4.2% (n = 37) of all referred patients enrolled and accepted a multi-call counseling program. Quitlines are a pillar of U.S. tobacco treatment. For quitlines to fulfill their potential, quitlines and hospitals must identify effective strategies for reaching and treating referred patients who smoke. Quitlines are effective and are readily available to many in advanced economy countries. Treatment engagement appears to be a barrier to quitline participation as we found few patients who were referred to the quitline actually enrolled in care. Quitlines should consider adopting alternative methods for reaching patients who smoke. Future research is warranted to determine effective solutions to breakdowns in transitions of care.

摘要

戒烟热线是有效的,对于接受三或三次以上咨询服务的来电者效果最佳。临床环境正在采用戒烟热线转介作为提供戒烟支持的一种方法,但对于这些转介后的入组和参与情况知之甚少。我们使用戒烟热线传真回复报告中的数据,描述了 878 名住院吸烟患者的入组情况和治疗参与度,这些患者在出院时通过安全电子邮件被转介至戒烟热线。我们比较了入组和未入组患者的患者人口统计学特征、烟草特征和治疗参与度。我们进行了卡方检验和 t 检验,以确定哪些变量应包含在逻辑回归中,以确定戒烟热线入组的预测因素。我们没有收到 25%(n=221)转介患者的传真回复报告;除了意向治疗分析外,这些患者均被排除在外。在收到报告的患者中,20.4%入组并接受了戒烟热线的至少一项服务。在未入组的 79.6%(n=523)吸烟患者中,大多数(78.3%;n=410)被戒烟热线归类为无法联系。年龄(p=0.006)、醒来后 30 分钟内吸烟(p=0.005)和戒烟意愿(p=0.008)是戒烟热线入组的显著预测因素。采用意向治疗分析,所有转介患者中有 11.4%(n=100)入组并接受了单次或多次电话项目;所有转介患者中有 4.2%(n=37)入组并接受了多次电话咨询项目。戒烟热线是美国烟草治疗的支柱。为了充分发挥戒烟热线的潜力,戒烟热线和医院必须确定有效的策略,以接触和治疗转介的吸烟患者。戒烟热线是有效的,在许多发达经济体国家都可以获得。治疗参与度似乎是戒烟热线参与的障碍,因为我们发现很少有被转介到戒烟热线的患者实际上入组接受治疗。戒烟热线应考虑采用其他方法来接触吸烟患者。未来的研究是必要的,以确定解决医疗保健交接失败的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验