Suppr超能文献

头颈部癌症治疗后淋巴水肿的治疗:系统评价。

Treatment for lymphedema following head and neck cancer therapy: A systematic review.

机构信息

Saint Louis University School of Medicine, 1402 S Grand Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63104, United States of America.

Saint Louis University Department of Otolaryngology, 3665 Vista Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110, United States of America.

出版信息

Am J Otolaryngol. 2019 Sep-Oct;40(5):761-769. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.05.024. Epub 2019 May 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To perform the first systematic review evaluating all established treatment modalities of head and neck lymphedema resulting from head and neck cancer therapy. Since craniofacial lymphedema treatment represents unique challenges not addressed by extremity lymphedema therapies, a systematic review and evaluation of treatment modalities specific to this area is needed to guide clinical management and further research.

DATA SOURCES

Four electronic databases were searches from inception to September 2018. These included Scopus (Embase), PubMed (Medline), Clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Databases.

REVIEW METHODS

A search string was developed, and all databases queried for keywords on three subjects: head and neck cancer, lymphedema, and therapy. Results were uploaded to an EndNote database where relevant items were identified by hand-searching all titles and abstracts. Subsequently results were combined, duplicates removed, and full papers screened according to eligibility criteria.

RESULTS

Of a total 492 search results, twenty-six items met eligibility criteria for this review. These included fourteen cohort studies, seven case reports, two randomized controlled trials, two systematic reviews, and one narrative review totaling 1018 study subjects. The manual lymph drainage group had the largest number of studies and participants, with fewer studies investigating selenium, liposuction, and lymphaticovenular anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

Evidence for the efficacy of all types of lymphedema therapy is limited by paucity of large randomized controlled trials. While manual lymph drainage is best studied, liposuction and surgical treatments have also been effective in a small number of patients.

摘要

目的

对所有经头颈部癌症治疗后引起的头颈部淋巴水肿的既定治疗方法进行首次系统评价。由于颅面部淋巴水肿的治疗具有独特的挑战,而这些挑战无法通过四肢淋巴水肿治疗来解决,因此需要对头颈部特定区域的治疗方法进行系统评价和评估,以指导临床管理和进一步研究。

资料来源

从建库至 2018 年 9 月,对 4 个电子数据库进行了搜索。这些数据库包括 Scopus(Embase)、PubMed(Medline)、Clinicaltrials.gov 和 Cochrane 数据库。

检索方法

制定了一个检索字符串,并对所有数据库进行了三个主题的关键词查询:头颈部癌症、淋巴水肿和治疗。将结果上传至 EndNote 数据库,通过手工搜索所有标题和摘要来识别相关项目。随后合并结果,删除重复项,并根据纳入标准筛选全文。

结果

在总共 492 项检索结果中,有 26 项符合本综述的纳入标准。其中包括 14 项队列研究、7 项病例报告、2 项随机对照试验、2 项系统评价和 1 项叙述性评价,共纳入 1018 例研究对象。手动淋巴引流组的研究和参与者数量最多,而硒、吸脂术和淋巴管静脉吻合术的研究较少。

结论

所有类型的淋巴水肿治疗方法的疗效证据均受到缺乏大规模随机对照试验的限制。虽然手动淋巴引流的研究最多,但吸脂术和手术治疗在少数患者中也有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验