• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌切除术后再入院率在区域化和非区域化中心相似:一项基于人群的队列研究。

Readmission rates following esophageal cancer resection are similar at regionalized and non-regionalized centers: A population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;158(3):934-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.061. Epub 2019 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.061
PMID:31176552
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Readmission following esophagectomy affects the patient experience, has important economic implications, and can be tied to hospital reimbursement. Ontario has regionalized thoracic centers; regionalized surgery may lower the readmission rate. We investigated whether surgery at regionalized thoracic centers is associated with reduced readmission following esophageal cancer resection.

METHODS

A retrospective, population-based cohort study (2002-2014) was conducted in Ontario, Canada (population 13.6 million). Adults with resected esophageal cancer were identified through the Ontario Cancer Registry. Multivariable regression was used to estimate the effect of surgery at a regionalized thoracic surgery center on readmission to any Ontario hospital within 90 days following discharge.

RESULTS

Of 3670 patients, 27.9% were readmitted within 90 days of discharge (n = 1022). Median hospital length of stay was 12 days (interquartile range 9-20). The readmission rate at thoracic centers was similar to other hospitals (28.1% vs 27.1%, P = .57). The readmission rate did not change during the 13-year study period. Case-mix adjusted readmission rates varied from 17.6% to 35.2% even across thoracic centers and were not related to hospital volume or perioperative mortality. After adjusting for confounders, we found that surgery at a thoracic center was not significantly associated with readmission (odds ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.27, P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgery at a designated thoracic surgery center did not reduce the risk of 90-day readmission following esophageal cancer resection, and readmission rates varied significantly even across thoracic centers. Our results suggest that despite universal, regionalized esophageal cancer care, there appears to be a minimum readmission threshold following esophagectomy that may be clinically necessary.

摘要

目的

食管癌切除术后的再入院会影响患者的体验,具有重要的经济意义,并可能与医院的报销有关。安大略省已经实现了胸外科的区域中心化;区域化手术可能会降低再入院率。我们研究了在区域化胸科中心进行手术是否与降低食管癌切除术后的再入院率有关。

方法

这是一项在加拿大安大略省进行的回顾性、基于人群的队列研究(2002 年至 2014 年)(人口 1360 万)。通过安大略省癌症登记处确定接受食管癌切除术的成年人。使用多变量回归来估计在区域化胸外科中心进行手术对出院后 90 天内任何安大略省医院再入院的影响。

结果

在 3670 名患者中,有 27.9%(n=1022)在出院后 90 天内再次入院。中位住院时间为 12 天(四分位间距为 9-20)。胸科中心的再入院率与其他医院相似(28.1%比 27.1%,P=0.57)。在 13 年的研究期间,再入院率没有变化。即使在胸科中心之间,病例组合调整后的再入院率也从 17.6%到 35.2%不等,且与医院容量或围手术期死亡率无关。调整混杂因素后,我们发现胸科中心的手术与再入院无显著相关性(比值比,1.10;95%置信区间,0.95-1.27,P=0.22)。

结论

在指定的胸外科中心进行手术并不能降低食管癌切除术后 90 天内再入院的风险,即使在胸科中心之间,再入院率也有很大差异。我们的研究结果表明,尽管有普遍的、区域化的食管癌治疗,但是食管癌手术后似乎存在一个最低的再入院门槛,这可能是临床所必需的。

相似文献

1
Readmission rates following esophageal cancer resection are similar at regionalized and non-regionalized centers: A population-based cohort study.食管癌切除术后再入院率在区域化和非区域化中心相似:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Sep;158(3):934-942.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.04.061. Epub 2019 May 3.
2
Variation in Diagnosis, Treatment, and Outcome of Esophageal Cancer in a Regionalized Care System in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省区域性照护体系中食管癌的诊断、治疗和结局的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2126090. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26090.
3
Why are patients being readmitted after surgery for esophageal cancer?为什么食管癌患者术后会再次入院?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May;149(5):1384-9; discussion 1389-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.064. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
4
Esophagectomy versus endoscopic resection for patients with early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database propensity-matched study.食管切除术与内镜下切除术治疗早期食管腺癌患者的效果比较:一项基于国家癌症数据库的倾向评分匹配研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 May;155(5):2211-2218.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.11.111. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
University hospital status and surgeon volume and risk of reoperation following surgery for esophageal cancer.大学医院的地位和外科医生的手术量与食管癌手术后再次手术的风险。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 May;44(5):632-637. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.02.212. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
6
Refining the thoracic surgical oncology regionalization standards for esophageal surgery in Ontario, Canada: Moving from good to better.完善加拿大安大略省食管癌手术的胸外科肿瘤学区域化标准:从良好迈向卓越。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Dec;166(6):1502-1509. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
7
Effect of body mass index on operative outcome after robotic-assisted Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: retrospective analysis of 129 cases at a single high-volume tertiary care center.体重指数对机器人辅助Ivor-Lewis食管切除术后手术结果的影响:对一家高容量三级医疗中心129例病例的回顾性分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12484.
8
Length of hospital stay after uncomplicated esophagectomy. Hospital variation shows room for nationwide improvement.单纯性食管癌手术后的住院时间。医院间的差异表明全国范围内仍有改进的空间。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6344-6357. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08103-4. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Short-Term Outcomes Following Minimally Invasive and Open Esophagectomy: A Population-Based Study from Finland and Sweden.微创与开放性食管切除术的短期疗效:来自芬兰和瑞典的基于人群的研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jan;25(1):326-332. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6212-9. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.食管癌手术:美国自发性集中化降低了死亡率且未造成健康差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1580-1587. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6339-3. Epub 2018 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Validation of the Bone Tumor Surgery Complexity Score.骨肿瘤手术复杂性评分的开发与验证
Reports (MDPI). 2024 May 10;7(2):35. doi: 10.3390/reports7020035.
2
Definition of the Surgical Case Complexity in the Treatment of Soft Tissue Tumors of the Extremities and Trunk.四肢及躯干软组织肿瘤治疗中手术病例复杂性的定义
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 18;14(6):1559. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061559.
3
Institutional-Level Differences in Quality and Outcomes of Lung Cancer Resections in the United States.美国肺癌切除术的质量和结果的机构层面差异。
Chest. 2021 Apr;159(4):1630-1641. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.075. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
4
Volume-Based Care Regionalization: Pitfalls and Challenges.基于容量的医疗区域化:陷阱与挑战。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Oct 20;38(30):3465-3467. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02269. Epub 2020 Sep 8.