Dehuisser Virginie, Bosmans Tim, Kitshoff Adriaan, Duchateau Luc, de Rooster Hilde, Polis Ingeborgh
Small Animal Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Small Animal Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2019 Jul;46(4):421-428. doi: 10.1016/j.vaa.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Mar 19.
To investigate alfaxalone total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) following premedication with methadone combined with acepromazine (ACP) or dexmedetomidine in bitches undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
Prospective, blinded, randomized, experimental study.
A group of 12 female Beagles.
Dogs were premedicated intravenously with methadone (0.2 mg kg) combined with ACP (20 μg kg, group AM) or dexmedetomidine (5 μg kg, group DM). Anaesthesia was induced with alfaxalone (2 mg kg). Anaesthetic maintenance was obtained with an alfaxalone variable rate infusion (VRI) started at 0.15 mg kg minute and adjusted every 5 minutes based on clinical assessment. Mechanical ventilation was initiated when necessary to maintain normocapnia. Anaesthetic monitoring included electrocardiogram, heart rate (HR), invasive diastolic (DAP), systolic (SAP) and mean arterial blood pressure, arterial haemoglobin oxygen saturation, respiratory variables and oesophageal temperature. Data were recorded every 5 minutes. A mixed model statistical approach was used to compare cardiovascular variables within and between groups (α = 0.05). A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare body temperature, VRI alfaxalone rate, administered rescue analgesia, sedation, induction, intubation, recovery scores and recovery times between treatments.
Overall HR, SAP and DAP differed between groups (p = 0.001, 0.016, 0.019, respectively). The mean VRI dose rate of alfaxalone differed between groups DM [0.13 (0.11-0.14) mg kg minute] and AM [0.18 (0.13-0.19) mg kg minute; p = 0.030]. Rescue analgesia was administered more in group AM (p = 0.019). No significant difference in recovery times and scores was observed between protocols.
Alfaxalone TIVA following dexmedetomidine/methadone premedication produced a more stable plane of anaesthesia to perform ovariohysterectomy than ACP/methadone. A dose reduction of alfaxalone of 27.7% was obtained in group DM compared with group AM. Recovery quality and recovery times were comparable between both groups.
研究在接受卵巢子宫切除术的母犬中,美沙酮联合乙酰丙嗪(ACP)或右美托咪定进行术前用药后,阿法沙龙全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA)的效果。
前瞻性、盲法、随机、实验性研究。
一组12只雌性比格犬。
犬只静脉注射美沙酮(0.2毫克/千克)联合ACP(20微克/千克,AM组)或右美托咪定(5微克/千克,DM组)进行术前用药。用阿法沙龙(2毫克/千克)诱导麻醉。通过以0.15毫克/千克·分钟开始的阿法沙龙可变速率输注(VRI)维持麻醉,并根据临床评估每5分钟调整一次。必要时启动机械通气以维持正常碳酸血症。麻醉监测包括心电图、心率(HR)、有创舒张压(DAP)、收缩压(SAP)和平均动脉血压、动脉血红蛋白氧饱和度、呼吸变量和食管温度。每5分钟记录一次数据。采用混合模型统计方法比较组内和组间的心血管变量(α = 0.05)。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较治疗之间的体温、VRI阿法沙龙速率、给予的救援镇痛、镇静、诱导、插管、恢复评分和恢复时间。
总体HR、SAP和DAP在组间存在差异(分别为p = 0.001、0.016、0.019)。DM组[0.13(0.11 - 0.14)毫克/千克·分钟]和AM组[0.18(0.13 - 0.19)毫克/千克·分钟;p = 0.030]之间阿法沙龙的平均VRI剂量率存在差异。AM组给予救援镇痛的情况更多(p = 0.019)。各方案之间在恢复时间和评分方面未观察到显著差异。
与ACP/美沙酮相比,右美托咪定/美沙酮术前用药后阿法沙龙TIVA在进行卵巢子宫切除术时产生的麻醉平面更稳定。与AM组相比,DM组阿法沙龙剂量降低了27.7%。两组之间的恢复质量和恢复时间相当。