Suppr超能文献

尽管术前使用头孢唑林对非过敏性青霉素过敏患者是安全的,但仍有20%的从业者避免使用它。

Despite the Safety of Preoperative Cefazolin for Patients With Non-anaphylactic Penicillin Allergy, 20% of Practitioners Avoid Its Use.

作者信息

Pettett Brett J, Eskildsen Scott M, Huang Kevin X, Ostrum Robert F

出版信息

Orthopedics. 2019 Sep 1;42(5):e437-e442. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190604-03. Epub 2019 Jun 13.

Abstract

Cefazolin is commonly used for surgical site infection prophylaxis due to its low cost and effective coverage. However, it is controversial to use cefazolin in patients with a penicillin allergy despite the cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin being only 1%. Ample literature shows that it is safe to use cefazolin in patients with non-anaphylactic penicillin allergies. However, there is often hesitation by anesthesiologists or orthopedists when prescribing this medication in this population. The current authors sent a 16-question survey to all the residency programs in the United States in anesthesiology and orthopedics asking physicians affiliated with these programs to answer a series of questions about their demographics, prescribing patterns, and knowledge of the cross-reactivity between penicillin and cefazolin. A total of 146 responses in each group, with 82.9% (n=121) of orthopedists and 78.8% (n=115) of anesthesiologists preferring cefazolin for patients with non-anaphylactic penicillin allergies. However, only 57.5% of anesthesiologists and 41.1% of orthopedists knew the correct cross-reactivity between cephalosporins and penicillin. If a provider knew the correct cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin, he or she had an increased odds of prescribing cefazolin to patients with nonanaphylactic penicillin allergies (orthopedics odds ratio [OR], 4.77, P<.01; anesthesiologists OR, 3.59, P<.01). Therefore, this study supports that further education of orthopedic and anesthesia providers about the cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin would lead to more evidence-based, cost-effective care. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):e437-e442.].

摘要

由于头孢唑林成本低且覆盖范围有效,常用于手术部位感染的预防。然而,尽管头孢唑林与青霉素之间的交叉反应率仅为1%,但在青霉素过敏患者中使用头孢唑林仍存在争议。大量文献表明,在非过敏性青霉素过敏患者中使用头孢唑林是安全的。然而,麻醉医生或骨科医生在为这一人群开这种药时往往会犹豫不决。本文作者向美国所有麻醉学和骨科住院医师培训项目发送了一份包含16个问题的调查问卷,要求这些项目所属的医生回答一系列关于他们的人口统计学、处方模式以及青霉素和头孢唑林交叉反应知识的问题。每组共收到146份回复,82.9%(n = 121)的骨科医生和78.8%(n = 115)的麻醉医生倾向于为非过敏性青霉素过敏患者使用头孢唑林。然而,只有57.5%的麻醉医生和41.1%的骨科医生知道头孢菌素与青霉素之间正确的交叉反应率。如果医疗服务提供者知道头孢唑林与青霉素之间正确的交叉反应率,那么他或她为非过敏性青霉素过敏患者开头孢唑林的几率就会增加(骨科优势比[OR],4.77,P <.01;麻醉医生OR,3.59,P <.01)。因此,本研究支持对骨科和麻醉科医疗服务提供者进行关于头孢唑林与青霉素交叉反应的进一步教育,这将带来更具循证性、更具成本效益的治疗。[《骨科》。2019年;42(5):e437 - e442。]

相似文献

1
Despite the Safety of Preoperative Cefazolin for Patients With Non-anaphylactic Penicillin Allergy, 20% of Practitioners Avoid Its Use.
Orthopedics. 2019 Sep 1;42(5):e437-e442. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20190604-03. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
2
Misconceptions Surrounding Penicillin Allergy: Implications for Anesthesiologists.
Anesth Analg. 2018 Sep;127(3):642-649. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003419.
3
Cefazolin as the mainstay for antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with a penicillin allergy in obstetrics and gynecology.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Oct;231(4):430-436. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.019. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
Are Cephalosporins Safe for Surgical Prophylaxis in Patients with Penicillin Allergy?
Laryngoscope. 2024 Jun;134(6):2486-2488. doi: 10.1002/lary.31222. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
8
Surgical prophylaxis in pediatric orthopedic patients with penicillin allergy: a multicentered retrospective prognostic study.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2024 Jul 1;33(4):363-368. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000001126. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
10
Comparison of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to preoperative antibiotics in patients labeled as penicillin allergic.
Surgery. 2021 Sep;170(3):777-782. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.063. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验