Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kaiser Permanente, Woodland Hills, CA, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2019 Nov;32(11):1627-1636. doi: 10.1038/s41379-019-0282-0. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
Well-differentiated hepatocellular neoplasms are currently classified in the World Health Organization scheme as hepatocellular adenoma or hepatocellular carcinoma. There is no recognized diagnostic category for atypical cases with borderline features, and we have designated these as atypical hepatocellular neoplasms. Diffuse glutamine synthetase staining is used as a surrogate marker to detect β-catenin activation, a well-recognized high risk feature in hepatocellular tumors. This study examined 27 well-differentiated hepatocellular neoplasms with diffuse glutamine synthetase staining, including 7 atypical hepatocellular neoplasms with no cytoarchitectural atypia, 6 atypical hepatocellular neoplasms with focal cytoarchitectural atypia, and 14 well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas. Capture-based next-generation sequencing was performed, and alterations in WNT pathway genes (CTNNB1, APC, AXIN1) were seen in 81% of cases (10/13 atypical hepatocellular neoplasms and 12/14 of hepatocellular carcinomas), while the molecular basis of diffuse glutamine synthetase staining was unclear in the remaining 19% of cases. Additional non-WNT pathway mutations (TP53, TSC1, DNMT3A, CREBBP) or copy number alterations were present in 56% of atypical hepatocellular neoplasms, with no significant difference in cases with or without focal cytoarchitectural atypia, supporting that all cases with β-catenin activation should be classified as atypical irrespective of atypia. Atypical hepatocellular neoplasm and hepatocellular carcinoma also demonstrated largely similar genomic profiles, but TERT promoter mutations were restricted to hepatocellular carcinoma (21%) and copy number alterations were more common in hepatocellular carcinoma (64 vs 31%). Mutational and copy number analysis may be helpful in characterization and risk stratification of atypical hepatocellular neoplasms when morphology and glutamine synthetase staining yield ambiguous results.
高分化肝细胞肿瘤目前在世界卫生组织的分类方案中被归类为肝细胞腺瘤或肝细胞癌。对于具有边界特征的非典型病例,尚无公认的诊断类别,我们将这些病例指定为非典型肝细胞肿瘤。弥漫性谷氨酰胺合成酶染色被用作检测β-连环蛋白激活的替代标志物,β-连环蛋白激活是肝细胞肿瘤中公认的高风险特征。本研究检查了 27 例弥漫性谷氨酰胺合成酶染色的高分化肝细胞肿瘤,包括 7 例无细胞结构异型性的非典型肝细胞肿瘤、6 例有局灶性细胞结构异型性的非典型肝细胞肿瘤和 14 例高分化肝细胞癌。进行了基于捕获的下一代测序,在 81%的病例(13 例非典型肝细胞肿瘤中的 10 例和 14 例肝细胞癌中的 12 例)中观察到 WNT 途径基因(CTNNB1、APC、AXIN1)的改变,而在其余 19%的病例中弥漫性谷氨酰胺合成酶染色的分子基础尚不清楚。在 56%的非典型肝细胞肿瘤中存在额外的非 WNT 途径突变(TP53、TSC1、DNMT3A、CREBBP)或拷贝数改变,无论是否存在局灶性细胞结构异型性,这些病例之间均无显著差异,支持所有存在β-连环蛋白激活的病例均应归类为非典型,无论是否存在异型性。非典型肝细胞肿瘤和肝细胞癌也表现出大致相似的基因组谱,但 TERT 启动子突变仅限于肝细胞癌(21%),而拷贝数改变在肝细胞癌中更为常见(64%对 31%)。当形态学和谷氨酰胺合成酶染色结果存在模棱两可时,突变和拷贝数分析可能有助于非典型肝细胞肿瘤的特征描述和风险分层。