Xue Weiguang, Lloyd Adam, Falla Edel, Roeder Claudia, Papsch Rudiger, Bühler Klaus
IQVIA, Real-World Evidence, London, UK.
Merck KGaA, Frankfurt, Germany.
Int J Womens Health. 2019 May 13;11:319-331. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S193048. eCollection 2019.
Demand for assisted reproduction technology (ART) in Germany is high, with 100,844 treatment cycles during 2016. Many ART procedures involve ovarian stimulation with follicle stimulating hormone (FSH). Recently, biosimilar FSH products have become available. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the recombinant FSH Gonal-f (Originator) in comparison to biosimilar follitropin alfa, Bemfola (Biosimilar 1) and Ovaleap (Biosimilar 2), from a German payer perspective in terms of cost per live birth. A decision tree model was developed, based on one cycle of assisted reproduction, to compare the original product to biosimilars. Clinical inputs, including live birth rates and adverse event rates were obtained from published randomized trials. Cost inputs were obtained from publicly available German sources. Clinical inputs, model structure and methodology were based on previous publications and validated by a clinical expert. Results indicated that the live birth rate is higher for the Originator compared to Biosimilar 1 (40.7% vs 32.1% respectively), and Biosimilar 2 (32.2% vs 26.8%). The average cost per live birth for women treated with the Originator was estimated to be lower than those who were treated with biosimilars: Originator vs Biosimilar 1 (€10,510 vs €12,192), Originator vs Biosimilar 2 (€12,590 vs €13,606). The analysis also found that the Originator is associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness of €4,168 and €7,540 per additional live birth versus Biosimilar 1 and Biosimilar 2 respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicated probabilities of pregnancy, embryo transfer and live birth, were key drivers of model costs. Scenario analysis confirmed the robustness of the model outcomes. This study suggests that treatment with the Originator could result in a lower cost per live birth in comparison to biosimilars. Further analysis using real-world data, when available, is recommended to validate the results of the present study.
德国对辅助生殖技术(ART)的需求很高,2016年有100,844个治疗周期。许多ART程序涉及使用促卵泡激素(FSH)进行卵巢刺激。最近,生物类似物FSH产品已上市。本研究的目的是从德国医保支付方的角度,就每例活产成本而言,评估重组FSH果纳芬(原研药)与生物类似物重组促卵泡素α、倍美盈(生物类似物1)和欧加利(生物类似物2)相比的成本效益。基于一个辅助生殖周期建立了决策树模型,以比较原研产品和生物类似物。临床数据输入,包括活产率和不良事件发生率,来自已发表的随机试验。成本数据输入来自德国公开可用的来源。临床数据输入、模型结构和方法基于先前的出版物,并经临床专家验证。结果表明,原研药的活产率高于生物类似物1(分别为40.7%对32.1%)和生物类似物2(32.2%对26.8%)。使用原研药治疗的女性每例活产的平均成本估计低于使用生物类似物治疗的女性:原研药对生物类似物1(10,510欧元对12,192欧元),原研药对生物类似物2(12,590欧元对13,606欧元)。分析还发现,与生物类似物1和生物类似物2相比,原研药每增加一例活产的增量成本效益分别为4,168欧元和7,540欧元。敏感性分析表明,怀孕、胚胎移植和活产的概率是模型成本的关键驱动因素。情景分析证实了模型结果的稳健性。本研究表明,与生物类似物相比,使用原研药治疗可能导致每例活产成本更低。建议在有可用的真实世界数据时进行进一步分析,以验证本研究的结果。