Dong Shu, Lau Hien, Chavarria Cody, Alexander Michael, Cimler Allison, Elliott John P, Escovar Sandra, Lewin Jack, Novak James, Lakey Jonathan R T
Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, California.
Alium Health, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019 Apr 30;90:61-67. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2019.04.003. eCollection 2019.
Traditional insulin treatment for diabetes mellitus with insulin administered subcutaneously yields nonpulsatile plasma insulin concentrations that represent a fraction of normal portal vein levels. Oral hypoglycemic medications result in the same lack of pulsatile insulin response to blood glucose levels. Intensive treatments of significant complications of diabetes are not recommended due to complicated multidrug regimens, significant weight gain, and the high risk of hypoglycemic complications. Consequently, advanced complications of diabetes do not have an effective treatment option because conventional therapy is not sufficient. Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) simulates normal pancreatic function by closely matching the periodicity and amplitude of insulin secretion in healthy subjects; however, the mechanisms involved with the observed improvement are not clearly understood.
The current review aims to analyze the pathophysiology of insulin secretion, discuss current therapies for the management of diabetes, provides an updates on the recent advancements of IIT, and proposes its mechanism of action.
A literature search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and CrossRef databases was performed on multiple key words regarding the history and current variations of pulsatile and IIT for diabetes treatment. Articles reporting the physiology of insulin secretion, advantages of pulsatile insulin delivery in patients with diabetes patients, efficacy and adverse effects of current conventional insulin therapies for the management of diabetes, benefits and shortcomings of pancreas and islet transplantation, or clinical trials on patients with diabetes treated with pulsed insulin therapy or advanced IIT were included for a qualitative analysis and categorized into the following topics: mechanism of insulin secretion in normal subjects and patients with diabetes and current therapies for the management of diabetes, including oral hypoglycemic agents, insulin therapy, pancreas and islet transplantation, pulsed insulin therapy, and advances in IIT.
Our review of the literature shows that IIT improves the resolution of diabetic ulcers, neuropathy, and nephropathy, and reduces emergency room visits. The likely mechanism responsible for this improvement is increased insulin sensitivity from adipocytes, as well as increased insulin receptor expression.
Recent advancements show that IIT is an effective option for both type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus patient populations. This treatment resembles normal pancreatic function so closely that it has significantly reduced the effects of relatively common complications of diabetes in comparison to standard treatments. Thus, this new treatment is a promising advancement in the management of diabetes. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2019; 80:XXX-XXX).
传统的糖尿病胰岛素治疗通过皮下注射胰岛素,会使血浆胰岛素浓度无脉冲式变化,仅为正常门静脉水平的一部分。口服降糖药物同样会导致对血糖水平缺乏脉冲式胰岛素反应。由于复杂的多药治疗方案、显著的体重增加以及低血糖并发症的高风险,不建议对糖尿病的严重并发症进行强化治疗。因此,糖尿病的晚期并发症没有有效的治疗选择,因为传统疗法并不充分。强化胰岛素治疗(IIT)通过紧密匹配健康受试者胰岛素分泌的周期性和幅度来模拟正常胰腺功能;然而,与观察到的改善相关的机制尚不清楚。
本综述旨在分析胰岛素分泌的病理生理学,讨论糖尿病管理的当前疗法,介绍IIT的最新进展,并提出其作用机制。
在PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase和CrossRef数据库上进行文献检索,检索关于脉冲式和IIT治疗糖尿病的历史及当前变化的多个关键词。纳入报告胰岛素分泌生理学、糖尿病患者脉冲式胰岛素给药优势、当前传统胰岛素疗法治疗糖尿病的疗效和不良反应、胰腺和胰岛移植的益处和缺点,或接受脉冲胰岛素治疗或先进IIT治疗的糖尿病患者临床试验的文章进行定性分析,并分为以下主题:正常受试者和糖尿病患者的胰岛素分泌机制以及糖尿病管理的当前疗法,包括口服降糖药、胰岛素治疗、胰腺和胰岛移植、脉冲胰岛素治疗以及IIT的进展。
我们的文献综述表明,IIT可改善糖尿病溃疡、神经病变和肾病的症状,并减少急诊就诊次数。这种改善的可能机制是脂肪细胞的胰岛素敏感性增加以及胰岛素受体表达增加。
最新进展表明,IIT对于1型糖尿病和2型糖尿病患者群体都是一种有效的选择。这种治疗与正常胰腺功能非常相似,与标准治疗相比,它显著降低了糖尿病相对常见并发症的影响。因此,这种新治疗方法是糖尿病管理方面一项有前景的进展。(《当前治疗研究与临床实验》。2019年;80:XXX - XXX)