Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Contraception. 2019 Oct;100(4):283-287. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
To assess the pharmacokinetics of combined oral contraceptive (COC) components and prevalence of ovulation in HIV-positive women using ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimens compared to those using regimens previously found not to interact with COCs or not using any antiretrovirals.
We conducted a prospective cohort pharmacokinetic pilot study comparing the pharmacokinetics of levonorgestrel (LNG) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) in HIV-positive women taking ritonavir-containing antiretroviral regimens to those in women using non-ritonavir-containing regimens or no antiretrovirals. Participants received COCs containing LNG/EE 150/30 mcg for 21 days. Beginning day 21, we collected serial blood samples over 72 h. The primary outcome was area under the curve (AUC) of LNG, with secondary outcomes including other LNG pharmacokinetic measures, EE pharmacokinetics and ovulation as measured by serum progesterone.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of LNG showed a trend toward increased exposure in women on ritonavir. LNG AUC increased by 32.6% (312±60.9 vs. 243±82.6 ng/mL*h, p=.033, n=5) in women taking ritonavir compared to the control group (n=10). The C (9.68±1.81 vs. 7.62±2.29 ng/mL) and C (4.97±1.15 vs. 3.70±1.29 ng/mL) were also higher in the ritonavir arm. After excluding the inconsistent users (n=2), CL of LNG was reduced in the ritonavir arm (p=.032). EE pharmacokinetic profiles were not different between groups. The progesterone concentrations were similar in women of both groups, and none were consistent with ovulation during the treatment cycle.
Women on ritonavir showed an approximately 30% increase in LNG exposure but no difference in EE exposure.
The current data suggest that ritonavir does not have a clinically significant impact on oral contraceptive pharmacokinetics.
评估与先前发现与 COC 无相互作用或不使用任何抗逆转录病毒药物的方案相比,使用含利托那韦的抗逆转录病毒方案的 HIV 阳性妇女中 COC 成分的药代动力学和排卵的发生率。
我们进行了一项前瞻性队列药代动力学试点研究,比较了服用含利托那韦的抗逆转录病毒方案的 HIV 阳性妇女与服用不含利托那韦的方案或未服用任何抗逆转录病毒药物的妇女中左炔诺孕酮(LNG)和乙炔雌二醇(EE)的药代动力学。参与者服用含有 LNG/EE 150/30 mcg 的 COC 21 天。从第 21 天开始,我们在 72 小时内采集了一系列血样。主要结局是 LNG 的曲线下面积(AUC),次要结局包括其他 LNG 药代动力学指标、EE 药代动力学和血清孕激素测量的排卵。
LNG 的药代动力学参数显示,利托那韦组的暴露量有增加的趋势。与对照组(n=10)相比,服用利托那韦的妇女 LNG AUC 增加了 32.6%(312±60.9 与 243±82.6 ng/mL*h,p=.033,n=5)。C(9.68±1.81 与 7.62±2.29 ng/mL)和 C(4.97±1.15 与 3.70±1.29 ng/mL)在利托那韦组也更高。排除不一致使用者(n=2)后,利托那韦组 LNG 的 CL 降低(p=.032)。两组 EE 药代动力学特征无差异。两组妇女的孕激素浓度相似,且在治疗周期内均无排卵迹象。
服用利托那韦的妇女 LNG 暴露量增加约 30%,但 EE 暴露量无差异。
目前的数据表明,利托那韦对口服避孕药的药代动力学没有显著的临床影响。