Yin Chengfen, Wang Lulu, Wang Zhiyong, Xu Lei
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Tianjin Third Central Hospital, Artificial Cells Key Laboratory of Tianjin, Tianjin Institute of Hepatobiliary Disease, Artificial Cell Engineering Technology Research Center of Public Health Ministry, Tianjin 300170, China. Corresponding author: Xu Lei, Email:
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 May;31(5):614-618. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.05.018.
To investigate the occurrence and influencing factors of long-term cognitive impairment in patients with sepsis.
The septic patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) of Tianjin Third Central Hospital from July 2014 to September 2017 were enrolled. Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA) was used to assess the cognitive function of patients at 3, 12 and 24 months after discharge from hospital. The patients were divided into cognitive impairment group (MoCA score < 26) and normal cognitive function group (MoCA score ≥ 26) according to the MoCA scores at 12 months after discharge from hospital. The basic characteristics and clinical data were recorded in both groups, the variables with statistical significance in univariate analysis were enrolled in bivariate Logistic regression analysis, and the influencing factors of cognitive impairment in patients with sepsis were screened.
During the study period, 1 748 patients with sepsis were admitted, 210 survived and discharged, and 125 patients participated in the follow-up. Cognitive impairment occurred in 61.6% (77/125), 54.4% (56/103) and 54.2% (39/72) of the septic patients at 3, 12 and 24 months after discharge, respectively. The MoCA score of 103 patients who completed 12-month follow-up was significantly higher than that of 3-month follow-up (23.4±5.7 vs. 23.0±6.0, P < 0.01); the MoCA score of 72 patients who completed 24-month follow-up was only slightly lower than that of 12-month follow-up (23.6±5.4 vs. 23.7±5.0, P > 0.05). Following up for 12 months, 47 patients were enrolled in the normal cognitive function group and 56 in the cognitive impairment group. Compared with the normal cognitive function group, the cognitive dysfunction group had more female [51.8% (29/56) vs. 31.9% (15/47)] and older patients (years old: 66.1±15.9 vs. 52.4±18.9), also had shorter time to receive education (years: 7.6±4.0 vs. 11.2±3.1), longer duration of delirium [days: 2 (0, 3) vs. 0 (0, 1)], with significant differences (all P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the marital status, severity of infection, underlying diseases, routes of transfer, total length of hospital stay, the length of ICU stay, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score within 24 hours of admission to ICU, hypoxemia, hypotension, mechanical ventilation, hemofiltration, or drug use between the two groups. Bivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that the duration of education was a protective factor for cognitive impairment in patients with sepsis who were followed up for 12 months [odds ratio (OR) = 0.791, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 0.678-0.923, P = 0.003], and age and duration of delirium were risk factors (age: OR = 1.038, 95%CI = 1.009-1.068, P = 0.010; duration of delirium: OR = 1.314, 95%CI = 1.002-1.724, P = 0.048).
Long-term cognitive impairment occurs in many septic patients after discharge and improves over time. Duration of education is a protective factor for cognitive impairment in patients with sepsis, while age and delirium duration are risk factors.
探讨脓毒症患者长期认知障碍的发生情况及其影响因素。
选取2014年7月至2017年9月在天津市第三中心医院重症监护病房(ICU)收治的脓毒症患者。采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)在患者出院后3、12和24个月评估其认知功能。根据出院后12个月的MoCA评分将患者分为认知障碍组(MoCA评分<26)和认知功能正常组(MoCA评分≥26)。记录两组患者的基本特征和临床资料,将单因素分析中有统计学意义的变量纳入二元Logistic回归分析,筛选脓毒症患者认知障碍的影响因素。
研究期间,共收治1748例脓毒症患者,210例存活出院,125例患者参与随访。出院后3、12和24个月,脓毒症患者认知障碍的发生率分别为61.6%(77/125)、54.4%(56/103)和54.2%(39/72)。完成12个月随访的103例患者的MoCA评分显著高于3个月随访时(23.4±5.7 vs. 23.0±6.0,P<0.01);完成24个月随访的72例患者的MoCA评分仅略低于12个月随访时(23.6±5.4 vs. 23.7±5.0,P>0.05)。随访12个月时,认知功能正常组47例,认知障碍组56例。与认知功能正常组相比,认知功能障碍组女性更多[51.8%(29/56) vs. 31.9%(15/47)]、年龄更大(岁:66.1±15.9 vs. 52.4±18.9),接受教育时间更短(年:7.6±4.0 vs. 11.2±3.1),谵妄持续时间更长[天:2(0,3) vs. 0(0,1)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。两组患者的婚姻状况、感染严重程度、基础疾病、转入途径、住院总时长、ICU住院时长、入住ICU 24小时内的急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评分、低氧血症、低血压、机械通气、血液滤过或用药情况等方面比较,差异均无统计学意义。二元Logistic回归分析显示,接受教育时间是随访12个月脓毒症患者认知障碍的保护因素[比值比(OR)=0.791,95%置信区间(95%CI)=0.678 - 0.923,P = 0.003],年龄和谵妄持续时间是危险因素(年龄:OR = 1.038,95%CI = 1.009 - 1.068,P = 0.010;谵妄持续时间:OR = 1.314,95%CI = 1.002 - 1.724,P = 0.048)。
许多脓毒症患者出院后存在长期认知障碍,且随时间推移有所改善。接受教育时间是脓毒症患者认知障碍的保护因素,而年龄和谵妄持续时间是危险因素。