Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Nov;21(11):1304-1311. doi: 10.1111/codi.14728. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
In patients with a previous history of rectal anastomotic leakage (AL), the surgical indications and timing for closure of a diverting stoma have to be carefully judged. Even if AL has apparently healed before stoma closure, re-leakage may occur after closure. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for recurrent AL following stoma closure. We also examined the treatment strategies aiming to minimize the risk of recurrent AL.
From January 2009 to December 2016, 1008 patients underwent sphincter-saving surgery [low anterior resection, all-sphincter-preserving rectal resection with hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA) and intersphincteric resection (ISR)] for primary rectal cancer with curative intent at our hospital. A total of 69 patients with AL with a Clavien-Dindo Grade III or more who subsequently underwent closure of a diverting stoma were retrospectively reviewed for this study.
The incidence of recurrent leakage after stoma closure in this series was 13% overall with an incidence of 25% in the CAA/ISR group and 5% in the low anterior resection group. Significant risk factors included hand-sewn anastomosis (P = 0.0257) compared to stapled anastomosis, ischaemia at the anastomotic site as the cause of initial AL (P < 0.001) and a shorter interval between confirmation of healing and stoma closure (P = 0.00952).
Ischaemia at the anastomotic site was the main risk factor for recurrent leakage, particularly after CAA/ISR. Additional treatment options before stoma closure should be considered to avoid re-leakage in such cases.
对于有直肠吻合口漏(AL)病史的患者,需要仔细判断关闭转流造口的手术适应证和时机。即使AL在关闭造口前已明显愈合,关闭后仍可能再次发生漏。本研究旨在确定造口关闭后复发性 AL 的发生率和危险因素。我们还检查了旨在最大限度降低复发性 AL 风险的治疗策略。
2009 年 1 月至 2016 年 12 月,我院共有 1008 例患者因原发性直肠癌接受保肛手术[低位前切除术、全括约肌保留直肠切除术加手工结直肠肛管吻合术(CAA)和经括约肌间切除术(ISR)],所有患者均具有治愈性。本研究回顾性分析了 69 例 AL 患者,AL 严重程度为 Clavien-Dindo 分级 III 级或更高级别,且随后接受了转流造口关闭术。
本研究中,造口关闭后再次漏的发生率为 13%,CAA/ISR 组的发生率为 25%,低位前切除术组的发生率为 5%。显著的危险因素包括手工吻合(P=0.0257)与吻合器吻合相比,初始 AL 为吻合口缺血(P<0.001)和从愈合确认到造口关闭的时间间隔较短(P=0.00952)。
吻合口缺血是复发性漏的主要危险因素,尤其是在 CAA/ISR 后。在这种情况下,应考虑在关闭造口前增加额外的治疗选择,以避免再次发生漏。