Kaliff Malin, Karlsson Mats G, Sorbe Bengt, Bohr Mordhorst Louise, Helenius Gisela, Lillsunde-Larsson Gabriella
Departments of Laboratory Medicine (M.K., M.G.K., G.H., G.L.-L.) Oncology (B.S., L.B.M.), Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University School of Health Sciences, Örebro University (G.L.-L.), Örebro, Sweden.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2020 May;39(3):279-288. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000612.
Despite the common perception that the human papilloma virus (HPV) is a requirement for the development of cervical cancer (CC), a considerable number of CCs test HPV negative. Presently, many countries are shifting to HPV primary CC screening, and it is of importance to increase the knowledge about the group of CCs that test HPV negative. The aim of this study was to reinvestigate a proportion of cervical tumors with a primary negative or invalid test result. Reinvestigation with repeated genotyping (targeting L1) was followed by analysis with an alternative target method (targeting E6/E7) on existing or additional tumor material. Consistently negative tumors were histologically evaluated, and cases with low or lacking tumor cell content, consistent invalid test results, or with suspicion of other than cervical origin were excluded. HPV-negative cases were thereafter subjected to immunohistochemistry (Cytokeratin 5, pan cytokeratin, protein 63, P16, and P53). The HPV-negative proportion could after reinvestigation be reduced by one-half (14%-7%). Additional positive samples were often detected in late polymerase chain reaction cycles, with an alternative (E6/E7) or the same (L1) target, or with a method using shorter amplicon lengths. Confirmed HPV negativity was significantly associated with worse prognosis, high patient age, longer storage time, and adenocarcinoma histology. Some of the HPV-negative cases showed strong/diffuse p16 immunoreactivity, indicating some remaining false-negative cases. False HPV negativity in this cohort was mainly linked to methodological limitations in the analysis of stored CC material. The small proportion of presumably true HPV-negative adenocarcinomas is not a reason for hesitation in revision to CC screening with primary HPV testing.
尽管人们普遍认为人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是宫颈癌(CC)发生的必要条件,但相当一部分CC患者的HPV检测呈阴性。目前,许多国家正在转向以HPV为主的CC筛查,因此,增加对HPV检测呈阴性的CC患者群体的了解非常重要。本研究的目的是对一部分初次检测结果为阴性或无效的宫颈肿瘤进行重新检测。首先采用重复基因分型(针对L1)进行重新检测,然后对现有或额外的肿瘤材料采用另一种靶向方法(针对E6/E7)进行分析。对始终呈阴性的肿瘤进行组织学评估,排除肿瘤细胞含量低或缺乏、检测结果持续无效或怀疑非宫颈来源的病例。此后,对HPV阴性病例进行免疫组织化学检测(细胞角蛋白5、泛细胞角蛋白、蛋白63、P16和P53)。重新检测后,HPV阴性比例可降低一半(从14%降至7%)。在后期聚合酶链反应循环中,常使用另一种(E6/E7)或相同(L1)靶点,或使用较短扩增子长度的方法检测到更多阳性样本。确诊的HPV阴性与预后较差、患者年龄较大、储存时间较长和腺癌组织学显著相关。一些HPV阴性病例显示出强/弥漫性p16免疫反应性,表明仍存在一些假阴性病例。该队列中HPV假阴性主要与储存的CC材料分析中的方法学局限性有关。推测真正HPV阴性的腺癌比例较小,不应成为犹豫是否采用HPV初筛进行CC筛查的理由。